“…To prove the validity of the hypothesis in PEM models, in Table 2 agglomerate characteristic frequency f 0 is reported for PEMFC, PAFC and HT-PEMFC agglomerate data from the literature [6,12,13,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. If the agglomerate radius is lower than 500 nm, f 0 is in the order of 1 kHz-1 MHz, thus higher than cathode charge transfer typical frequency range (10-100 Hz).…”
Section: Validity Of the Hypothesisṽ (mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…5 the AC effectiveness factors are plotted as a function of the Thiele Modulus for three geometries. While increasing the [19] 85.0 100 0.5 a 3Á10 5 2011 Sousa [21] 3.50 500 0.3 7Á10 2 2010 Gerteisen [20] 0.50 200 0.4 5Á10 2 2009 Gerteisen [13] 20.0 100 0.5 a 6Á10 3 2007 Choudhury [17] 100.0 1000 0.5 a 3Á10 3 2006 Shah [18] 0 Thiele modulus, the AC effectiveness factors decrease from a value of 1 with a very fast decrease around f n = 1, consistently with what already known regarding the steady state effectiveness factor. Differences between considered geometries become evident, since higher catalyst utilization is obtained in the spherical geometry.…”
“…To prove the validity of the hypothesis in PEM models, in Table 2 agglomerate characteristic frequency f 0 is reported for PEMFC, PAFC and HT-PEMFC agglomerate data from the literature [6,12,13,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. If the agglomerate radius is lower than 500 nm, f 0 is in the order of 1 kHz-1 MHz, thus higher than cathode charge transfer typical frequency range (10-100 Hz).…”
Section: Validity Of the Hypothesisṽ (mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…5 the AC effectiveness factors are plotted as a function of the Thiele Modulus for three geometries. While increasing the [19] 85.0 100 0.5 a 3Á10 5 2011 Sousa [21] 3.50 500 0.3 7Á10 2 2010 Gerteisen [20] 0.50 200 0.4 5Á10 2 2009 Gerteisen [13] 20.0 100 0.5 a 6Á10 3 2007 Choudhury [17] 100.0 1000 0.5 a 3Á10 3 2006 Shah [18] 0 Thiele modulus, the AC effectiveness factors decrease from a value of 1 with a very fast decrease around f n = 1, consistently with what already known regarding the steady state effectiveness factor. Differences between considered geometries become evident, since higher catalyst utilization is obtained in the spherical geometry.…”
“…At higher current density, the cell potential decreases rapidly due to mass limitation [16,17]. This linearity is termed as the concentration over potential and shown in Eq.…”
“…Using Eqs. (16) and (17), one can plot the curves of R * f and R * g varying with i, as shown in Fig. 5, where R * f ¼ R f =r f and R * g ¼ R g =r, and ðR * f Þ opt and ðR * g Þ opt are the values of R * f and R * g at the maximum power output density.…”
Section: The Optimal Matching Of Load Resistancesmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.