2022
DOI: 10.4069/kjwhn.2022.12.14.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stepping stones for the future—2022 major developments, journal metrics, and appreciation for reviewers

Abstract: The Year of the Tiger was projected to bring forth resilience and strength in the face of challenges [1]. This certainly rings true for the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing (KJWHN), as we sought to follow the prior year's success in being indexed in Scopus. I wish to describe some noteworthy accomplishments of the journal in 2022 and share some messages for potential authors. Major developments in 2022On October 29, 2022, KJWHN received notice of its release to PubMed Central (PMC) live site three months… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 presents data on manuscripts submitted to KJWHN as of December 10, 2023. The increase in unsolicited manuscripts, from 63 in 2022 [ 8 ] to 80 in 2023, suggests a boost from being indexed in PMC and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) in 2022. A notable increase in international submissions was also seen.…”
Section: Journal Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 presents data on manuscripts submitted to KJWHN as of December 10, 2023. The increase in unsolicited manuscripts, from 63 in 2022 [ 8 ] to 80 in 2023, suggests a boost from being indexed in PMC and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) in 2022. A notable increase in international submissions was also seen.…”
Section: Journal Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notable increase in international submissions was also seen. However, compared to seven unsuitable manuscripts in 2022 [ 8 ], a substantial increase of 30 manuscripts was also observable this year. These editorial or ‘desk’ rejections were largely due to incongruency with our aims and scope or concerns with high percentages in screening for plagiarism.…”
Section: Journal Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations