1993
DOI: 10.1042/bj2910389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereospecificity of rolipram actions on eosinophil cyclic AMP-specific phosphodiesterase

Abstract: The stereospecificity of rolipram inhibition of particulate cyclic AMP-specific phosphodiesterase (PDE IV) from guinea-pig eosinophils has been investigated. (-)-Rolipram (IC50 = 0.22 +/- 0.08 microM) was 2.5-fold more potent than (+)-rolipram (IC50 = 0.58 +/- 0.05 microM) in inhibiting membrane-bound PDE IV. Solubilization of PDE IV with deoxycholate (0.5%) and NaCl (100 mM) increased rolipram stereospecificity [IC50 (-)-rolipram = 0.020 +/- 0.002 microM; IC50 (+)-rolipram = 0.33 +/- 0.07 microM]. Partial pur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The potency order of PDE4 inhibitors tested in this study was in agreement with the potency orders of these inhibitors reported previously for inhibition of enzyme activity (Schneider et al, 1986;Souness et al, 1997Souness et al, , 1999Saldou et al, 1998 3 H]rolipram binding by non-PDE4 inhibitors was less potent and showed no significant differences between the two radioligands. Consistent with their low binding affinities, these drugs also have been shown to be very poor inhibitors of PDE4 enzymatic activity (Schneider et al, 1986;Souness and Scott, 1993;Makhay et al, 2001).…”
Section: Inhibitor Binding To Pde4 569mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The potency order of PDE4 inhibitors tested in this study was in agreement with the potency orders of these inhibitors reported previously for inhibition of enzyme activity (Schneider et al, 1986;Souness et al, 1997Souness et al, , 1999Saldou et al, 1998 3 H]rolipram binding by non-PDE4 inhibitors was less potent and showed no significant differences between the two radioligands. Consistent with their low binding affinities, these drugs also have been shown to be very poor inhibitors of PDE4 enzymatic activity (Schneider et al, 1986;Souness and Scott, 1993;Makhay et al, 2001).…”
Section: Inhibitor Binding To Pde4 569mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…They reported that the peripheral organs tested showed either no detectable [ 3 H]rolipram binding or a very low specific binding capacity. Although the nature of the HARBS is not yet clear, it has been suggested to be one of the two distinct conformations of PDE4 (Torphy et al, 1992;Souness and Scott, 1993 ICI 63,197, and Ro 20-1724 were better described by a two-site model, while the competition curves for piclamilast, cilomilast, roflumilast, and CDP 840 were adequately described by a one-site model. K i values are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Inhibitor Binding To Pde4 569mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although 1 has been often used as the racemate in biological experiments, the biological activity of the enantiomers may be widely divergent [9][10][11][12]. Therefore we considered it desirable to use this compound routinely as a single enantiomer for both in vitro and in vivo studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it has been shown that the eudismic ratio can vary depending on the source of the PDE enzyme, there is general agreement that (R)-(Ϫ)-rolipram is the more potent of the two enantiomers. 22,33) As representative examples, Fig. 3 shows a comparison of the IC 50 's for PDE4D inhibition of the (R)-and (S)-enantiomers of compounds (1) (rolipram) and (11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%