2007
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotactic radiosurgery alone versus resection plus whole‐brain radiotherapy for 1 or 2 brain metastases in recursive partitioning analysis class 1 and 2 patients

Abstract: This article reports an experimental and theoretical study of the peroxide‐induced degradation of polypropylene in a corotating twin‐screw extruder. Experiments were performed with different peroxide concentrations and different operating conditions. The evolution of the chemical reaction along the extruder was monitored with specific sampling devices. Material changes were characterized by rheological measurements and via the determination of the molecular weights of samples collected at the same locations. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
40
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, SRS represents a valuable alternative choice in certain patients [25,35] characterized by a high LC response rate and low morbidity, as in our present work. Previous analyses have demonstrated a clear LC and, in some cases, OS benefit for SRS in patients with a limited number of brain metastases [2,23,25,[28][29][30]. Whether SRS would demonstrate a survival advantage if only applied in TCC patients with few brain secondaries (up to three) in our institute, remains a speculation and a higher number of patients are required to clarify this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, SRS represents a valuable alternative choice in certain patients [25,35] characterized by a high LC response rate and low morbidity, as in our present work. Previous analyses have demonstrated a clear LC and, in some cases, OS benefit for SRS in patients with a limited number of brain metastases [2,23,25,[28][29][30]. Whether SRS would demonstrate a survival advantage if only applied in TCC patients with few brain secondaries (up to three) in our institute, remains a speculation and a higher number of patients are required to clarify this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, if the patient has stable systemic disease and brain metastases are well controlled, the survival is significantly improved. The prognosis of patients with a single brain metastasis appears to be much better than those with multiple metastases [18,19]. Therefore, treatment of such patients is often more aggressive and includes focal therapy, such as surgical resection or SRS in combination with WBRT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical resection may be used as the sole technique or in combination with WBRT after resection or SRT; SRS may be used on the surgical cavity after the resection. WBRT after the surgical resection decreases the risk of disease recurrence however this advantage doesn't project into overall survival benefit suggesting the possibility of deferring the WBRT, SRS or SRT for the time of disease recurrence (14)(15)(16)(17)(18). By contrast, SRT with WBRT compared with WBRT alone increases the overall survival of treated patients, indicating that these treatment modalities should be combined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%