Stereotyping in the digital age: Male language is “ingenious”, female language is “beautiful” – and popular

Abstract

The huge power for social influence of digital media may come with the risk of intensifying common societal biases, such as gender and age stereotypes. Speaker’s gender and age also behaviorally manifest in language use, and language may be a powerful tool to shape impact. The present study took the example of TED, a highly successful knowledge dissemination platform, to study online influence. Our goal was to investigate how gender- and age-linked language styles–beyond chronological age and identified gender–link to talk impact and whether this reflects gender and age stereotypes. In a pre-registered study, we collected transcripts of TED Talks along with their impact measures, i.e., views and ratios of positive and negative talk ratings, from the TED website. We scored TED Speakers’ (N = 1,095) language with gender- and age-morphed language metrics to obtain measures of female versus male, and younger versus more senior language styles. Contrary to our expectations and to the literature on gender stereotypes, more female language was linked to higher impact in terms of quantity, i.e., more talk views, and this was particularly the case among talks with a lot of views. Regarding quality of impact, language signatures of gender and age predicted different types of positive and negative ratings above and beyond main effects of speaker’s gender and age. The differences in ratings seem to reflect common stereotype contents of warmth (e.g., “beautiful” for female, “courageous” for female and senior language) versus competence (e.g., “ingenious”, “informative” for male language). The results shed light on how verbal behavior may contribute to stereotypical evaluations. They also illuminate how, within new digital social contexts, female language might be uniquely rewarded and, thereby, an underappreciated but highly effective tool for social influence. WC = 286 (max. 300 words).

Psychological trauma and emotional upheaval as revealed in academic writing: The case of COVID-19

“…Writing that scores high on this measure is often "cold," "dispassionate," or impersonal compared to writing that scores low on this measure (Seraj et al, 2021). Analytic thinking is an important marker of various psychological processes and individual differences, including persuasion (Markowitz, 2019(Markowitz, , 2020, cultural trends in politics (Jordan et al, 2019), and gender in entertainment speeches (Meier et al, 2020). Prior work has also used analytic thinking to indicate how members of the World Health Organization appraised rising COVID-19 cases and deaths over time (Markowitz, 2021).…”

Gender Bias and the Lack of Equity in Pandemic Nursing in China: A Qualitative Study

“…Clearly, media reports are not correct for frontline nurses, who are expected to demonstrate professional medical skills during their frontline experiences rather than rely on their appearance and identities to be considered heroes of the moment. Such stereotyped female power roles are the embodiment of the ideology of patriarchal society [ 39 ]. The media tends to commoditize this gendered power, but in fact, women need to be seen as individuals who can speak and be heard.…”

I am a scientist . . . Ask Me Anything: Examining differences between male and female scientists participating in a Reddit AMA session

“…In contrast, if they encounter a female scientist who is using complex language, this might violate their expectations and lead to evaluating the message unfavorably. Meier et al (2020) found some support for this hypothesis when they evaluated the language used by males and females who have given a TED Talk. Specifically, females who embraced female communication stereotypes by exuding warmth and using a narrative style for scientific explanations received higher ratings on recorded talks than females who used a more analytically, stereotypical male style.…”