2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic estimation of human arm impedance under nonlinear friction in robot joints: A model study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pivoting stiffness was quantified using a non-parametric system identification method based on the relationships between the perturbed torque, measured torque, and measured angle (9, 23). Briefly, pivoting stiffness frequency response function (FRF) was determined using Welch’s periodogram method to estimate the power spectral density of the applied 2Hz perturbed torque, measured pivoting torque, and measured pivoting angle (4, 9, 23). Then, leg pivoting stiffness was estimated as the magnitude of the pivoting stiffness FRF at 2Hz (4, 9, 23).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pivoting stiffness was quantified using a non-parametric system identification method based on the relationships between the perturbed torque, measured torque, and measured angle (9, 23). Briefly, pivoting stiffness frequency response function (FRF) was determined using Welch’s periodogram method to estimate the power spectral density of the applied 2Hz perturbed torque, measured pivoting torque, and measured pivoting angle (4, 9, 23). Then, leg pivoting stiffness was estimated as the magnitude of the pivoting stiffness FRF at 2Hz (4, 9, 23).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, pivoting stiffness frequency response function (FRF) was determined using Welch’s periodogram method to estimate the power spectral density of the applied 2Hz perturbed torque, measured pivoting torque, and measured pivoting angle (4, 9, 23). Then, leg pivoting stiffness was estimated as the magnitude of the pivoting stiffness FRF at 2Hz (4, 9, 23). The reliability of leg pivoting stiffness estimation was validated based on coherence of the perturbed torque and the measured angle (close to 1) and coherence of the perturbed torque and the measured torque (close to 1) with low phase angle (close to 0°) of the FRF at 2Hz (4, 9, 23).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of motor control, the systematic pattern was found to be affected by wrist and forearm biomechanics, which can be quantified by its coupled dynamic properties (i.e., multi-DOF impedance) [1][2][3][4][5], [7], [14][15][16][17]. The multi-DOF impedance includes limb inertia, damping, and stiffness [1][2][3], [14][15][16][17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-DOF impedance includes limb inertia, damping, and stiffness [1][2][3], [14][15][16][17]. Moreover, the systematic pattern in the wrist 2 DOF (FE and RUD) may be affected by multi-DOF anisotropic stiffness [5], [7] (with nonzero cross-coupled stiffness between DOFs [7], [9], [13], [15], [18]), provided that the 2 DOF impedance can be described as a linear 2 nd order dynamic having values assumed (but not measured except for stiffness) as in [5], [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%