American Society for Composites 2019 2019
DOI: 10.12783/asc34/31415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain Distributions in Bonded Composites Using Optical Fibers and Digital Image Correlation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turning to the comparison of DIC and FBG measurements, Figure 11a,b shows the evolution of longitudinal strain obtained from FBG sensors and DIC inspection blocks located on the composite skin and steel surface adjacent to adhesive. The results show functional coherence between both types of measurements, in line with the observations reported in Saha and Sullivan [41] for composite joints and in Jaiswal et al [43] for multi-material joints.…”
Section: Fbg Measurement Of (Longitudinal) Strainsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Turning to the comparison of DIC and FBG measurements, Figure 11a,b shows the evolution of longitudinal strain obtained from FBG sensors and DIC inspection blocks located on the composite skin and steel surface adjacent to adhesive. The results show functional coherence between both types of measurements, in line with the observations reported in Saha and Sullivan [41] for composite joints and in Jaiswal et al [43] for multi-material joints.…”
Section: Fbg Measurement Of (Longitudinal) Strainsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Xavier et al [ 40 ] used DIC and an embedded FBG sensor to measure external and internal strain in the epoxy adhesive of wooden double cantilever beam specimens. Saha and Sullivan [ 41 ] recorded the longitudinal surface strain distribution for a composite double‐lap shear joint subjected to a tension test by means of embedded FBG sensors (at adhesive–adherend interface and in the bulk adhesive) and DIC. Manterola et al [ 42 ] monitored mode I crack growth in double cantilever beam specimens bonded with rigid methacrylate adhesive and silicone‐based flexible adhesive using embedded FBG sensors, DIC, back‐face strain gauges, ultrasonic inspection and acoustic emission sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum strain peak observed at this point of the test was about 800 µε and can be associated with the beginning of the bonded region, according to Saha et al [43]. Each curve represents the strain profile recorded at a specific load level reached during the test.…”
Section: Obr Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…117,119 Maintenance of such tanks is difficult, with special care needed for the structural health monitoring of bonded composite joints. Lap-shear joints formed in such applications develop large out-of-plane peel stresses 120,121 and undergo a significant reduction in ultimate strength. 122,123 Moreover, metal liners add to the overall weight and reduce the amount of usable cryogenic fuel.…”
Section: Methods To Reduce Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%