“…can be divided in two groups-imaging and diffraction. The former originally exploits atomically resolved TEM micrographs with respect to lattice fringe distances~Bierwolf Bayle et al, 1994;Jouneau et al, 1994;Robertson et al, 1995;Rosenauer et al, 1998!. As the observed high-resolution pattern is formed by the interference of all diffracted beams passing the objective aperture, subsequent studies included partly extensive analysis of the phases of Bragg beams as a function of specimen thickness, orientation, composition, crystal potential Fourier components, lens aberrations, and defocus~Tillmann et al, 2000;Hÿtch & Plamann, 2001;Rosenauer et al, 2001;Rosenauer et al, 2006;Guerrero et al, 2007;Müller et al, 2010;Yu & Mader, 2010!. One disadvantage common to all high-resolution TEM techniques is the restricted field of view not only because the lattice fringe pattern must be sampled densely enough to measure fringe spacings precisely, but also because measured fringe distances need to be normalized tõ substrate! regions with known strain state, which may be too far away from the region of interest.…”