DOI: 10.32657/10356/11852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic analysis of large local construction companies in China

Abstract: Chapter 2 Literature Review …………………………………………10 2.1 Overview of the Schools of Thoughts in Strategy ………………………10 2.2 Strategy Theories in the Construction Context …………………………18 2.3 Literature related to the Chinese Construction Industry ……………….22 2.4 Theoretical Foundations for Building a Conceptual Model Tailored for the Chinese Construction Industry ………….……………………….25

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They vary from simple counts of number of businesses (Jin et al 2013;yee, Cheah 2006) to measures which assign weights to the relative importance of each business within the company portfolio. Examples of such variables include the entropy measure (Kim, Reinschmidt 2011 or the concentration ratio (Kang 2006). In this study, it was used a continuous variable representing the number of core businesses to measure diversification.…”
Section: Truncated Regression To Analyze the Impact Of Strategies On mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They vary from simple counts of number of businesses (Jin et al 2013;yee, Cheah 2006) to measures which assign weights to the relative importance of each business within the company portfolio. Examples of such variables include the entropy measure (Kim, Reinschmidt 2011 or the concentration ratio (Kang 2006). In this study, it was used a continuous variable representing the number of core businesses to measure diversification.…”
Section: Truncated Regression To Analyze the Impact Of Strategies On mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organization structure is not proved to be significantly related to performance in sales and profit. This result is consistent with the findings of Kale (1999), Kang (2006) and Liu (2007) which indicated the least relevance of organization structure to the performance of construction firms. According to Rang (2006), the formalisation of organization structure had a positive impact on project management capability.…”
Section: Hypothesis 2: Foreign Aec Firms' Capabilities and Their Perfsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, these six capabilities are the most suitable ones for foreign AEC firms governed by the existing restrictive regulatory framework. In contrast, organizational structure has the least relevance to the performance of construction firms (Kale, 1999;Kang, 2006;Liu, 2007). This is consistent with the statistical analysis result presented in Chapter 6.…”
Section: Summary Of Hypothesis 2: the Relationship Between Foreign Aesupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations