2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic and institutional effects on foreign IPO performance: Examining the impact of country of origin, corporate governance, and host country effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
104
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
3
104
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies of the relationship between the foreign activities of ventures and their IPO performance exist, and those that do exist suggest that internal factors such as the top management team, and external factors such as host country institutions impact IPO performance (Bell et al, 2012;Certo et al, 2009). This study responds to Certo et al's (2009) call for more research into the relationship between international diversification and IPO performance by focusing on the international intensity of new ventures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Few studies of the relationship between the foreign activities of ventures and their IPO performance exist, and those that do exist suggest that internal factors such as the top management team, and external factors such as host country institutions impact IPO performance (Bell et al, 2012;Certo et al, 2009). This study responds to Certo et al's (2009) call for more research into the relationship between international diversification and IPO performance by focusing on the international intensity of new ventures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Multinational firms, even when their headquarters are based in high-corruption countries, often have such codes and enforce them. Fourth, lack of knowledge of the local environment may prevent foreign firms from getting involved in corruption (Zaheer, 1995;Zaheer and Mosakowski, 1997;Cuervo-Cazurra et al, 2007;Bell et al, 2012). Fifth, existing empirical evidence suggests that foreign firms have a lower propensity to bribe (Kouznetsov and Dass, 2010;Gueorguiev and Malesky, 2012;D'Souza and Kaufmann, 2013).…”
Section: H1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beatty and Zajac (1994) argue that, when executive incentive mechanisms fail to align interests of managers and investors, IPO firms should rely more heavily on board monitoring. An independent board may be one of the most important favorable governance signals that U.S. investors expect when evaluating unfamiliar firms (Bell, Moore, and Filatotchev, 2011). Independent boards that possess a diverse set of skills and experiences are considered important to investors (Useem et al, 1993) because they imply the firm will be better governed and capable of attaining higher performance levels (Millestein and MacAvoy, 1998).…”
Section: Board Independencementioning
confidence: 99%