2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy Analysis for project portfolio evaluation in a technology consulting company by the hybrid method THOR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to prioritize which waste should be treated by LH in a medical clinic of a middle-sized Brazilian hospital using the MCDA method THOR 2 (Hybrid Multicriteria Decision Support Algorithm for Decision Processes with Discrete Alternatives). The method has been applied in several problem situations (Santos et al, 2022;Esteves et al, 2022;Gomes et al, 2021;Tenorio et al, 2021).…”
Section: Waste Reduction Using the Thor Hybrid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to prioritize which waste should be treated by LH in a medical clinic of a middle-sized Brazilian hospital using the MCDA method THOR 2 (Hybrid Multicriteria Decision Support Algorithm for Decision Processes with Discrete Alternatives). The method has been applied in several problem situations (Santos et al, 2022;Esteves et al, 2022;Gomes et al, 2021;Tenorio et al, 2021).…”
Section: Waste Reduction Using the Thor Hybrid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MCDA methods, such as AHP and AHP-Gaussian, are very useful to support the decision-making process in these cases because they consider value judgments, not technical issues alone, to evaluate alternatives to solving real problems, creating a highly multidisciplinary approach [79,80].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The THOR 2 method also provides that the value of the criterion weight is multiplied by the cloudy-approximation index, deteriorating the comparison according to the degree and safety of the data [ 53 ]. Thus, even with lack of data, the method allows the completion of the classification of alternatives and weights in the decision matrix, making it possible to estimate the value and assign a low value of pertinence to the attribution of that data, thus avoiding the elimination of the alternative or criterion due to the absence of data.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%