Strategy Development for Anticipating and Handling a Disruptive Technology

Chan, Stephen

doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2006.03.014

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A subset of eight of the twenty-three publications selected for further analysis used the term "disruptive" in the title but did not provide evidence for the disruptive character of the discussed technologies. These papers contain examples of technical innovations or new drugs which claim to provide additional value as compared to the current standard but do not constitute a disruptive innovation as defined by Christensen (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Hence, these papers will not be discussed further.…”

Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Disruptive technologies in health care disenchanted: a systematic review of concepts and examples

Perleth¹,

Bidino²,

Huang³

et al. 2022

Int J Technol Assess Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To clarify the concept of disruptive technologies in health care, provide examples and consider implications of potentially disruptive technologies for health technology assessment (HTA). Methods: We conducted a systematic review of conceptual and empirical papers on healthcare technologies that are described as "disruptive." We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 2013 to April 2019 (updated in December 2021). Data extraction was done in duplicate by pairs of reviewers utilizing a data extraction form. A qualitative data analysis was undertaken based on an analytic framework for analysis of the concept and examples. Key arguments and a number of potential predictors of disruptive technologies were derived and implications for HTA organizations were discussed. Results: Of 4,107 records, 28 were included in the review. Most of the papers included conceptual discussions and business models for disruptive technologies; only few papers presented empirical evidence. The majority of the evidence is related to the US healthcare system. Key arguments for describing a technology as disruptive include improvement of outcomes for patients, improved access to health care, reduction of costs and better affordability, shift in responsibilities between providers, and change in the organization of health care. A number of possible predictors for disruption were identified to distinguish these from "sustaining" innovations. Conclusions: Since truly disruptive technologies could radically change technology uptake and may modify provision of care patterns or treatment paths, they require a thorough evaluation of the consequences of using these technologies, including economic and organizational impact assessment and careful monitoring.

show abstract

Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Disruptive technologies in health care disenchanted: a systematic review of concepts and examples

Perleth¹,

Bidino²,

Huang³

et al. 2022

Int J Technol Assess Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This often takes place because the competition is faster and more efficient in adopting and deploying the new technology (Christensen, 1997;Chan, 2006). A disruptive technology can be either a combination of a set of existing technologies or an entirely new technology by itself, whose application to problem areas might cause major paradigm shifts in technological products (Walsh and Linton, 2000;Kostoff et al, 2004).…”

Section: Disruptive Technologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Defining a Set of Metrics to Evaluate the Potential Disruptiveness of a Technology

Ganguly

Nilchiani

Farr

2010

Engineering Management Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Other forms of innovation also occur in industrial processes of products and services. Such innovation model is focused on modifications in the processes of producing goods (6) . These two forms of innovation are jointly denominated as technological innovation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

O perfil Brasileiro de propriedade intelectual em radiologia e diagnóstico por imagem em um contexto internacional, nos anos 2000-2009

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJETIVO: Analisar a inovação tecnológica brasileira na área de radiologia e diagnóstico por imagem, em termos de indicadores de patentes. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Este é um estudo analítico-exploratório de informações recuperadas por meio de consultas cruzadas nas bases de dados dos escritórios de propriedade intelectual do Brasil (Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial - INPI), dos Estados Unidos (United States Patent and Trademark Office - USPTO) e da Europa (European Patent Office - EPO). RESULTADOS: Foram encontradas 277.057 patentes. Desse total, 7.800 foram registradas no INPI (3%), 65.428 (24%) registradas no EPO e 203.829 (73%) emitidas no USPTO. O Brasil é o país signatário em 1.732 patentes publicadas no INPI, 80 no EPO e 26 no escritório USPTO. Globalmente, 219.993 (79%) patentes referiam-se a dispositivos eletrônicos ligados a informática em saúde, ultrassonografia, ressonância magnética, tomografia computadorizada e procedimentos de geração, comunicação e arquivamento de imagens, e 57.064 (21%) das patentes tratavam das tecnologias relacionadas a radioproteção e dosimetria, física nuclear, eletroterapia, terapia magnética e radioterapia. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados obtidos apontam para a fragilidade da produção nacional de inovação tecnológica registrada em patentes, no campo de radiologia e diagnóstico por Imagem.

show abstract

Strategy Development for Anticipating and Handling a Disruptive Technology

Cited by 7 publications

References 6 publications

Disruptive technologies in health care disenchanted: a systematic review of concepts and examples

Disruptive technologies in health care disenchanted: a systematic review of concepts and examples

Defining a Set of Metrics to Evaluate the Potential Disruptiveness of a Technology

O perfil Brasileiro de propriedade intelectual em radiologia e diagnóstico por imagem em um contexto internacional, nos anos 2000-2009

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About