2013
DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.19.3.265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stream Loss Contributions to a Municipal Water Supply Aquifer in Memphis, Tennessee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the EPMP is based on the conceptual model, in practice the model value is based on fitting the results to the specified model with the least error. The primary issue is that the width of the window, x, is poorly constrained, even in situations where the distance to the window, x*, is constrained by other data (e.g., Sheahan well field, Larsen et al ; ; Ivey et al ). However, the actual sensitivity of the EPM results on the EPMP is minimal in some cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the EPMP is based on the conceptual model, in practice the model value is based on fitting the results to the specified model with the least error. The primary issue is that the width of the window, x, is poorly constrained, even in situations where the distance to the window, x*, is constrained by other data (e.g., Sheahan well field, Larsen et al ; ; Ivey et al ). However, the actual sensitivity of the EPM results on the EPMP is minimal in some cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogeologic windows are intervals in the upper Claiborne confining unit that are thin due to erosion (e.g., Bradley ) or comprise predominantly sand facies rather than silt and clay (e.g., Larsen et al ), such that water may be exchanged between the Shallow and Memphis aquifers. More recently, 3 H/ 3 He and geochemical data from production wells have shown a clear association of modern water in the Memphis aquifer with proximity to hydrogeologic windows (Larsen et al ; Gentry et al ; Ivey et al ; Koban et al ; Larsen et al ). Several of these studies using tracers and geochemical mixing models showed that as much as 75% of the water produced from some production wells is modern water, likely from a nearby surface water source (Larsen et al ; Koban et al ; Larsen et al ; Gallo ).…”
Section: Hydrogeologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So far, two different approaches have been employed to answer this question. The first approach is the "geochemical investigation" [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] where groundwater samples are analyzed to identify geochemical signatures that are attributed to surface water within the groundwater. Within the Memphis area, age-dating of groundwater by using tritium-helium-3 and sulfur hexafluoride support geochemical data, and reflects the influence of modern water (<50 years) in the Memphis aquifer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the Memphis area, age-dating of groundwater by using tritium-helium-3 and sulfur hexafluoride support geochemical data, and reflects the influence of modern water (<50 years) in the Memphis aquifer. Subsequent studies have shown that modern water contributes up to 40% of groundwater withdrawn from production wells-in one case, production water contains as much as 75% modern water [9][10][11]. The second approach is the "geological investigation", in which techniques, such as surveying stratigraphic thickness and water table elevation, electrical resistivity surveys, shear-wave seismic reflection, and other geophysical analyses are used to identify gaps in impermeable layers [5,[14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%