1980
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(80)90269-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Streamer chamber study of the cross sections and multiplicities in nucleus-nucleus interactions at the incident momentum of 4.5 GeV/c per nucleon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 displays the inelastic cross section for combinations of hydrogen and carbon nuclei as function of the total energy per nucleon of the projectile, E CR . Also shown in the figure are literature values for the inelastic cross section (Aksinenko et al, 1980;Antchev et al, 2013;Terashima et al, 2014;Aaboud et al, 2016a,b;Tanabashi et al, 2018;Antchev et al, 2019) that are generally in good agreement with the simulated cross section. Other species combinations show a qualitatively similar behavior.…”
Section: The Inelastic Cross Sectionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Figure 1 displays the inelastic cross section for combinations of hydrogen and carbon nuclei as function of the total energy per nucleon of the projectile, E CR . Also shown in the figure are literature values for the inelastic cross section (Aksinenko et al, 1980;Antchev et al, 2013;Terashima et al, 2014;Aaboud et al, 2016a,b;Tanabashi et al, 2018;Antchev et al, 2019) that are generally in good agreement with the simulated cross section. Other species combinations show a qualitatively similar behavior.…”
Section: The Inelastic Cross Sectionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Figure 1 displays the inelastic cross section for combinations of hydrogen and carbon nuclei as function of the total energy per nucleon of the projectile, E CR . Also shown in the figure are literature values for the inelastic cross section (Aksinenko et al, 1980;Antchev et al, 2013;Terashima et al, 2014;Aaboud et al, 2016a,b;Tanabashi et al, 2018;Antchev et al, 2019) that are generally in good agreement with the simulated cross section. Other species combinations show a qualitatively similar behavior.…”
Section: The Inelastic Cross Sectionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that the results of Ref. [93] are not reliable. For this reason, it is not surprising that none of the models fits the Aksinenko data point for the 12 C + 28 Si system.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Parametrisations With The Experimental Dat...mentioning
confidence: 95%