1980
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(80)90106-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening cuts for mixed integer programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lemma is closely related to a result of Balas and Jeroslow [3]. It implies the following property.…”
Section: Lemma 6 Let ψ Be a Minimal Valid Function And π Be A Minimsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This lemma is closely related to a result of Balas and Jeroslow [3]. It implies the following property.…”
Section: Lemma 6 Let ψ Be a Minimal Valid Function And π Be A Minimsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Note that if ψ is extreme for (3), then ψ is minimal. (3) and (ψ, π ) is valid for (1), then (ψ, π ) is extreme for (1). (3), and π 1 = π 2 = π since π 1 ≥ π and π 2 ≥ π .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function φ is called the 'fill-in function' [25,26] or alternatively the above procedure is called the 'monoidal strengthening' technique [7]. The validity of the fill-in function rests on the fact that integer variables corresponding to columns r and r + u where u ∈ Z 2 must obtain the same coefficient in any facet-defining inequality for (1).…”
Section: Coefficients Of Integer Variables In (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What would be preferable would be valid inequalities for (1) taking into account the integrality of the integer non-basic variables, even if these inequalities cut off parts of the set (2). One way to keep the strong coefficients of the continuous variables and to improve further the coefficients of the integer non-basic variables is to use lifting, based on the use of so-called 'fill-in functions' [25,26] or the 'monoidal strengthening' technique [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once a violated cut has been found as a solution of (5), the cut can be easily strengthened a posteriori through the Balas and Jeroslow [10] procedure. Such a strengthening can be seen as finding the best split disjunction for a given set of Farkas multipliers.…”
Section: Separating Disjunctive Cuts In Milpmentioning
confidence: 99%