2021
DOI: 10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening the Organizing of Articles Readings among Graduate Students to Support their Construction of Research Proposals

Abstract: The use of proper and appropriate technology can help graduate students’ in developmental and constructive writing. The editing and refining processes involved in the writing can either be carried out individually or in small groups. These processes are helpful for novice education researchers to work on and build their research proposals. Their ability to organize information based on their reading of articles, as well as organizing the identified information systematically, is essential for writing a researc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The content validity according to previous studies [23]- [25] of the questionnaire used in the study was determined to ascertain that the items contained in the questionnaire were relevant to the targeted bullying construct that it was designed to measure. In this study, content validity was done via a validation procedure to determine the appropriateness and suitability of the questionnaire [26] by involving six appointed experts. The bullying items within the questionnaire were thoroughly researched, examined, and discussed with these experts, before distributing them to the samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The content validity according to previous studies [23]- [25] of the questionnaire used in the study was determined to ascertain that the items contained in the questionnaire were relevant to the targeted bullying construct that it was designed to measure. In this study, content validity was done via a validation procedure to determine the appropriateness and suitability of the questionnaire [26] by involving six appointed experts. The bullying items within the questionnaire were thoroughly researched, examined, and discussed with these experts, before distributing them to the samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal consistency reliability is achieved when items used to measure the construct are "capable of independently measuring the same concept so that the respondents attach the same overall meaning to each of the items" [27]. The most frequently used statistic to assess internal consistency reliability is Cronbach's alpha [26], whose measures range from 0 to 1 with values falling between .60 and .70 being indicative of acceptable reliability [22]. However, for social science research, a value of more than .70 is considered desirable [27], and the closer the value is to 1, the higher the internal consistency reliability [27].…”
Section: Internal Consistency Reliability Testmentioning
confidence: 99%