1966
DOI: 10.1080/00202967.1966.11869991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress in Very Thin Chromium Electrodeposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then w h e n steel was the substrate there is a sharp decrease in the stress to compression. A similar compressive stress was observed in a hexavalent solution by Cleghorn and West (9) w h e n the substrate was nickel. They attributed the compressive stress to hydrogen diffusing into the substrate away from its interface with the deposit.…”
Section: N T T H a T T H E C O P P E R W H I C H Cod E P O S I T E D ...supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Then w h e n steel was the substrate there is a sharp decrease in the stress to compression. A similar compressive stress was observed in a hexavalent solution by Cleghorn and West (9) w h e n the substrate was nickel. They attributed the compressive stress to hydrogen diffusing into the substrate away from its interface with the deposit.…”
Section: N T T H a T T H E C O P P E R W H I C H Cod E P O S I T E D ...supporting
confidence: 74%
“…It was inferred that the topography and deposit structure of the chromium were significantly affected by interfacial epitaxy. Epitaxy of chromium has previously been observed only in thin (<0.1 ~m) deposits on nickel (2)(3)(4) and on copper (5). Anticipating discernible effects on deposit structure, 15-30 ~m deposits from sulfate and sulfate plus silicofluoride catalyzed baths were examined microscopically and by x-ray diffraction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%