Strip-based immunoassay for rapid detection of thiabendazole

Blažková, Martina; Rauch, P.; Fukal, L.

doi:10.1016/j.bios.2010.02.011

Cited by 87 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To reduce the number of samples requiring confirmation, screening tests can be applied whereby only samples deemed to be positive are forwarded for confirmation [110]. There are many screening methods that have applications for pesticides: near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy [111], ELISA [112], fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assay [113], lateral flow devices [114,115], highperformance thin-layer chromatography-enzyme inhibition [116], and biosensors [110] are a few examples.…”

Section: Pesticidesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biosensors for the analysis of microbiological and chemical contaminants in food

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increases in food production and the ever-present threat of food contamination from microbiological and chemical sources have led the food industry and regulators to pursue rapid, inexpensive methods of analysis to safeguard the health and safety of the consumer. Although sophisticated techniques such as chromatography and spectrometry provide more accurate and conclusive results, screening tests allow a much higher throughput of samples at a lower cost and with less operator training, so larger numbers of samples can be analysed. Biosensors combine a biological recognition element (enzyme, antibody, receptor) with a transducer to produce a measurable signal proportional to the extent of interaction between the recognition element and the analyte. The different uses of the biosensing instrumentation available today are extremely varied, with food analysis as an emerging and growing application. The advantages offered by biosensors over other screening methods such as radioimmunoassay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, fluorescence immunoassay and luminescence immunoassay, with respect to food analysis, include automation, improved reproducibility, speed of analysis and real-time analysis. This article will provide a brief footing in history before reviewing the latest developments in biosensor applications for analysis of food contaminants (January 2007 to December 2010), focusing on the detection of pathogens, toxins, pesticides and veterinary drug residues by biosensors, with emphasis on articles showing data in food matrices. The main areas of development common to these groups of contaminants include multiplexing, the ability to simultaneously analyse a sample for more than one contaminant and portability. Biosensors currently have an important role in food safety; further advances in the technology, reagents and sample handling will surely reinforce this position.

show abstract

Section: Pesticidesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biosensors for the analysis of microbiological and chemical contaminants in food

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Gold nanoparticles are often preferred (Seydack, 2005;Anfossi et al, 2011), but other materials such as colloidal carbon (Blažková et al, 2009(Blažková et al, , 2010(Blažková et al, , 2011Koets et al, 2006;Lönnberg et al, 2008;Noguera et al, 2011;OKeeffe et al, 2003), latex particles (Campbell et al, 2007) or quantum dots (Zou et al, 2010) and enzymes (Mirasoli et al, 2012) are also employed. In a survey performed by Gordon and Michel (2008) for sensitivities of labels that are used in lateral flow assays, carbon nanoparticles were ranked above gold and latex nanoparticles.…”

Section: Immunochromatographic Assay Principlementioning

confidence: 98%

“…Accordingly, the development of quantitative immunochromatographic tests is gaining increasing attention. Successful examples have been described for the analysis of proteins (Kim et al, 2006;van Amerongen et al, 1994;Wei et al, 2011), nucleic acids (Blažková et al, 2011;He et al, 2011;Noguera et al, 2011;van Amerongen and Koets, 2005), and small organic molecules (Blažková et al, 2010;Campbell et al, 2007;Hua et al, 2010;Kaur et al, 2007;Omidfar et al, 2010;Mirasoli et al, 2012;O'Keeffe et al, 2003;Wang et al, 2011;Xie et al, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Development of an immunochromatographic assay based on carbon nanoparticles for the determination of the phytoregulator forchlorfenuron

Suárez-Pantaleón

Wichers

Abad‐Somovilla

et al. 2013

Biosensors and Bioelectronics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Immunochromatographic electrochemical biosensors (IEBs) have fascinated the great concern for developing a portable, rapid, sensitive and inexpensive immunosensor (Lu et al, 2005;Liu et al, 2007;Lin et al, 2008;Blazkova et al, 2010). With the originally designed IEB, we have successfully detected the Ig G and the prostate-specific antigen Lin et al, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

A novel immunochromatographic electrochemical biosensor for highly sensitive and selective detection of trichloropyridinol, a biomarker of exposure to chlorpyrifos

Wang¹,

Lu²,

Wang³

et al. 2011

Biosensors and Bioelectronics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Strip-based immunoassay for rapid detection of thiabendazole

Cited by 87 publications

References 29 publications

Biosensors for the analysis of microbiological and chemical contaminants in food

Biosensors for the analysis of microbiological and chemical contaminants in food

Development of an immunochromatographic assay based on carbon nanoparticles for the determination of the phytoregulator forchlorfenuron

A novel immunochromatographic electrochemical biosensor for highly sensitive and selective detection of trichloropyridinol, a biomarker of exposure to chlorpyrifos

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About