2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stroke Pattern and Handrim Biomechanics for Level and Uphill Wheelchair Propulsion at Self-Selected Speeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
67
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
10
67
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the SLOP and DLOP, the ARC and SC patternfavored by the participants with tetraplegia do not require lifting the arm above the push rim and hence may require less involvement of the shoulder abductor. The ARC pattern also keeps the hands close to the rim and avoids multiple changes in direction, a potential advantage identified by Richter et al 13 The DLOP pattern incorporates high braking and acceleration of the upper limb, as noted by Shimada et al 10 which is likely to impose a relatively high level of muscular control. Additional research with larger sample sizes of the participants with tetraplegia can explain the lack of DLOP and SLOP hand movement patterns in manual wheelchair users with tetraplegia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the SLOP and DLOP, the ARC and SC patternfavored by the participants with tetraplegia do not require lifting the arm above the push rim and hence may require less involvement of the shoulder abductor. The ARC pattern also keeps the hands close to the rim and avoids multiple changes in direction, a potential advantage identified by Richter et al 13 The DLOP pattern incorporates high braking and acceleration of the upper limb, as noted by Shimada et al 10 which is likely to impose a relatively high level of muscular control. Additional research with larger sample sizes of the participants with tetraplegia can explain the lack of DLOP and SLOP hand movement patterns in manual wheelchair users with tetraplegia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The ARC pattern was determined to be the most preferred while propelling uphill. 13 The ARC pattern was also found to have the lowest metabolic cost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory investigations have revealed shoulder joint forces and moments (5,18), and muscle demands (24) are greater during inclined versus level propulsion. Wheelchair users also change their stroke patterns based on surface inclination angle (22). Yet laboratory conditions are limited to ergometer and level tile terrain, and are constrained in their ability to manipulate rolling resistance, propulsion distance, and the inertial effects of propulsion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors consider that wheelchair propulsion on a treadmill is the situation that most closely simulates real-life propulsion on a smooth surface. 6,7 Given the lack of similar studies, we undertook this study to analyze shoulder kinetics while propelling a wheelchair placed on a treadmill and to compare shoulder joint net forces and moments when changing the speed of wheelchair propulsion on the treadmill. We hypothesized that 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%