2016
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0518-16.2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong Evidence for Pattern Separation in Human Dentate Gyrus

Abstract: The hippocampus is proposed to be critical in distinguishing between similar experiences by performing pattern separation computations that create orthogonalized representations for related episodes. Previous neuroimaging studies have provided indirect evidence that the dentate gyrus (DG) and CA3 hippocampal subregions support pattern separation by inferring the nature of underlying representations from the observation of novelty signals. Here, we use ultra-high-resolution fMRI at 7 T and multivariate pattern … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
203
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
11
203
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results lend validity to cross-species studies and less direct methods of investigating dentate gyrus contributions to pattern separation in humans, including computational models and high-resolution fMRI (Berron et al, 2016;Rosenbaum, Gilboa, & Moscovitch, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The current results lend validity to cross-species studies and less direct methods of investigating dentate gyrus contributions to pattern separation in humans, including computational models and high-resolution fMRI (Berron et al, 2016;Rosenbaum, Gilboa, & Moscovitch, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Recent neuroimaging studies using multivariate classification approaches have also demonstrated that neural patterns are largely uncorrelated in the DG/CA3 subregion 56 . Recently, ultrahigh-resolution 7T fMRI was used to demonstrate that the DG, but not other hippocampal subfields or medial temporal cortices, exhibits distinct neural patterns for similar items, thus suggesting that the human DG is perhaps selectively engaged in pattern separation 57 . Interestingly, patient B.L., a 54-year-old man with selective bilateral ischemic lesions to the DG subregion of the hippocampus, was found to have impaired performance on a mnemonic discrimination task, which further suggests that the DG is required for pattern separation 58 .…”
Section: Hippocampal Pattern Separation and Episodic Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A smaller number of studies have met condition 3 35,52,123 , and we find that this condition is often overlooked in clinical samples where performance could be altered on a number of untested conditions. Condition 4 has often been met 20,31,35,36,51,57,114 , but perhaps not in the same studies that satisfy conditions 1-3. One reason that concurrently satisfying all four conditions may be difficult is that imposition of an explicit task will sometimes lead to a diminished ability to record subfield-specific evidence of pattern separation 33 .…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scenes require the integration of multiple visual features, which is impaired in patients with hippocampal damage [47]. Further, hippocampal activity has been shown for complex discrimination of scenes [48], with evidence for the orthogonalization of scenes in the dentate gyrus [49]. Thus, we investigated whether the MST-Scenes would be more sensitive to age-related decline, with a greater relationship to hippocampal volume than MST-Objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%