Strong multistep interference effects in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts /><mml:none /><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.16em" /><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math>to the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>9</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>2</mm

Keeley, N.; Kemper, K. W.; Rusek, K.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.92.054618

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In all three systems coupling to the 4.44-MeV 2 + excited state of the 12 C target was included, with the B(E2) taken from Raman et al [6] and the nuclear deformation length, δ 2 = −1.40 fm, from Ref. [7]. For the 15 C + 12 C system, coupling to the 0.74-MeV 5/2 + bound excited state of 15 C was included using the B(E2) of Ref.…”

Section: (): V-volmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of halo single-neutron transfer on near barrier $$^{15}$$C + $$^{12}$$C total fusion

2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A recent comparison of the average fusion cross section, $$\left\langle \sigma _\mathrm {F}\right\rangle $$ σ F , for energies just above the Coulomb barrier for the $$^{12-15}$$ 12 - 15 C + $$^{12}$$ 12 C systems found that the behaviour as a function of projectile neutron excess could not be satisfactorily explained by static barrier penetration model calculations and suggested that the neutron dynamics plays an important rôle. In this work we demonstrate that the ($$^{15}$$ 15 C,$$^{14}$$ 14 C) single neutron transfer has a significant influence on the above barrier $$^{15}$$ 15 C + $$^{12}$$ 12 C total fusion, although not quite in the way expected since it leads to a reduction in the cross section, contrary to the trend in the measured $$\left\langle \sigma _\mathrm {F}\right\rangle $$ σ F . However, this result underlines the danger of ignoring the effect of neutron transfer reactions on fusion in systems involving neutron halo nuclei.

show abstract

Section: (): V-volmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of halo single-neutron transfer on near barrier $$^{15}$$C + $$^{12}$$C total fusion

2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One of the most famous methods used to extract spectroscopic factor for (d,p) reaction has been discussed by N. Keeley [19]. The extraction of spectroscopic factor could be done for all reactions.…”

Section: Single Folding Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Astrophysical S-Factor for 7Li(P,γ)8Be by Different Sets of Optical Parameters

Amar¹

2019

Arab Journal of Nuclear Sciences and Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The available experimental data for 7 Li(p,p) 7 Li elastic scattering have been investigated using both optical potential as well as single folding optical potential in which the real part of the potential is derived on the basis of single folding model. Approximated optical potential parameters have been obtained for the real part using DFPOT code. The real part was normalized and the imaginary part was optimized at all ranges of energies. The calculated normalization factor N R was 0.8. The agreement between the experimental data and the theoretical calculations has been achieved at the different concerned energies using ECISS88 program. The calculation of astrophysical S-factor for 7 Li(p,γ) 8 Be radiative capture reaction has been performed using a potential model. Different sets of optical potential parameters have been used during analysis. It has been found that different potential parameters play a crucial role and have a significant effect on the calculated S-factor. It has been shown that optical parameters have the greatest effect on astrophysical S-factor through the calculation presented in this study.

show abstract