2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.100.022116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong unitary uncertainty relations

Abstract: In this paper we provide a new set of uncertainty principles for unitary operators using a sequence of inequalities with the help of the geometric-arithmetic mean inequality. As these inequalities are "fine-grained" compared with the well-known Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, our framework naturally improves the results based on the latter. As such, the unitary uncertainty relations based on our method outperform the best known bound introduced in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 230402 (2018)] to some extent. Explicit examp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(95 reference statements)
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We use brackets and convex functions to derive variance-based unitary uncertainty relations in the products form for two unitary operators in all quantum systems, which is simple to understand and can be well presented. We show that our new bound outperforms Bong et al's [35] in the whole range as well as Yu et al's [38] and Li et al's [39] in almost the whole interval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We use brackets and convex functions to derive variance-based unitary uncertainty relations in the products form for two unitary operators in all quantum systems, which is simple to understand and can be well presented. We show that our new bound outperforms Bong et al's [35] in the whole range as well as Yu et al's [38] and Li et al's [39] in almost the whole interval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The lower bounds K 2 and K 0.1 2 can be calculated by Theorem 1(2). The bounds are drawn in figure 3 and it is seen that our bound is tighter than Bong et al's, Yu et al's and Li et al's [35,38,39](see figure 4).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations