2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.04.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and optical properties of CdS thin films grown by chemical bath deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
60
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
9
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In CdS (CSS) strong and high peak was H(002) for two samples and it was C(111) for third sample. It was very difficult to elucidate for (c) sample as hexagonal or cubic structure, because difference in position of peak was very small upto (0.021 o ) as reported [26][27]. Height of peak/ intensity was 4000, 2500, and 1000 counts at 2θ value of (26.705, 26.8218 and 26.5638) degree, other peaks were H(002), H(103) and C(220) which proved the polycrystalline behavior of CdS thin films.…”
Section: Structural Analysis Of Cds (Cbd) and Cds (Css)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In CdS (CSS) strong and high peak was H(002) for two samples and it was C(111) for third sample. It was very difficult to elucidate for (c) sample as hexagonal or cubic structure, because difference in position of peak was very small upto (0.021 o ) as reported [26][27]. Height of peak/ intensity was 4000, 2500, and 1000 counts at 2θ value of (26.705, 26.8218 and 26.5638) degree, other peaks were H(002), H(103) and C(220) which proved the polycrystalline behavior of CdS thin films.…”
Section: Structural Analysis Of Cds (Cbd) and Cds (Css)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A (CE595 Double Beam Digital U.V spectrophotometer, CECIL instrument) was used to record the optical transmission for CdS films. from which the absorption coefficient (α) calculated [12]: (7) where d is the film thickness, and T is the transmission.…”
Section: Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several authors have reported explicitly or implicitly that the lower the reaction temperature the lower the thin film growth rate [12,15,20,21,23,28,34,35,54,[77][78][79][80][81]84,87,90,[103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121]. Thus, without delving into the cases in which homogeneous precipitation is favored, which limits the maximum d-a limit which was directly reported [12,15,21] or simply evident in the results reported [115,118,120] by some authors-the use of low temperatures lengthens the time required to achieve a thin film with determined d compared to the time required at higher temperatures.…”
Section: Selection Of a Convenient Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%