2019
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1705421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural-aware simulation analysis of supply chain resilience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides TTR, we also used FI to assess SCRes, and to evaluate the loss of capacity during the recovery period ( Ivanov et al., 2016 ; Simchi-Levi et al., 2015 ). Notably, the higher the capacity loss due to an interruption, the less resilient is a supply chain against disruptions ( Tan et al., 2019 ). Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides TTR, we also used FI to assess SCRes, and to evaluate the loss of capacity during the recovery period ( Ivanov et al., 2016 ; Simchi-Levi et al., 2015 ). Notably, the higher the capacity loss due to an interruption, the less resilient is a supply chain against disruptions ( Tan et al., 2019 ). Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proactive strategies are primarily technology-driven strategies that rely on developing technical infrastructures, such as digital connectivity and supply chain automation to avoid future disruptions ( Ralston and Blackhurst, 2020 ; Tan et al., 2019 ; Hofmann et al., 2019 ). Iakovou et al.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation studies allow adding additional, dynamic features to the optimization techniques which are widely used in SC risk analysis , Sadghiani et al, 2015, Cui et al, 2016, Ivanov et al, 2016 along with heuristic approaches (Meena and Sarmah, 2013, Zhang et al, 2015, Hasani and Khosrojerdi, 2016. Most of the existing studies utilize discrete-event simulation approach (Schmitt and Singh, 2012, Ivanov, 2017a, 2017b, Schmitt et al, 2017, Ivanov and Rozhkov, 2017, Macdonald et al, 2018, Ivanov, 2019, Tan et al, 2020 while some studies use agent-based (Li and Chan, 2013, Hou et al, 2018 and system dynamics (Wilson, 2007, Aboah et al, 2019 methods, too. A very few studies (e.g., Hackl and Dubernet, 2019) have incorporated the simulation and transportation disruptions during the epidemic crises.…”
Section: Simulation-based Sc Risk Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies (Basole and Bellamy 2014;Dolgui 2014a, 2014b;Kim, Chen, and Linderman 2015;Brintrup, Wang, and Tiwari 2015;Sawik 2017;Macdonald et al 2018;Yoon et al 2018;Scheibe and Blackhurst 2018;Pavlov et al 2018;Ojha et al 2018;Giannoccaro, Nair, and Choi 2017;Ivanov 2018Ivanov , 2019Dolgui, Ivanov, and Sokolov 2018;Li et al 2019;Pavlov et al 2019b) recognised the structural SC properties as crucial determinant to maintain stability and robustness and to achieve resilience. Another important observation in literature is a linkage of SC complexity and resilience (Blackhurst et al 2005;Nair and Vidal 2011;Bode and Wagner 2015;Dubey et al 2019a;Tan, Cai, and Zhang 2020). emphasise that complex networks become more vulnerable to severe disruptions which change the SC structures and are involved with SC structural dynamics.…”
Section: Viability Vs Stability Robustness and Resilience Of Scsmentioning
confidence: 99%