2021
DOI: 10.1002/er.6851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural, electronic, mechanical, and thermoelectric properties of LiTiCoX (X = Si, Ge) compounds

Abstract: Summary In the present work, we have used the first principles approach combined with semi classical Boltzmann Transport equations to calculate the structural, mechanical, electronic, and thermoelectric properties of LiTiCoX (X = Si, Ge). These materials are indirect band gap semiconductors with band gap 1.22 eV for LiTiCoSi and 1.09 eV for LiTiCoGe, respectively. Both materials are mechanically and dynamically stable. At room temperature, the value of Seebeck coefficient is 2016 μV/K (1799 μV/K) for LiTiCoSi … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant changes in effective mass in 2D structure could be due to the deviation of 2D band structure from the parabolic E versus k 2 relation. The effective mass of electrons and holes is calculated using the relation 39,44 m * ꞊ 22Ek2. According to this relation, the effective mass of both type of carriers depends on the curvature of the bands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The significant changes in effective mass in 2D structure could be due to the deviation of 2D band structure from the parabolic E versus k 2 relation. The effective mass of electrons and holes is calculated using the relation 39,44 m * ꞊ 22Ek2. According to this relation, the effective mass of both type of carriers depends on the curvature of the bands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the chemical stability, we have calculated formation energy of the monolayer NiO 2 . The material is chemically stable and can be synthesized experimentally if the value of its formation energy is negative 44,45 . If E (NiO 2 ) 2D is the energy of NiO 2 in its stable 2D structure, E (Ni) FCC is the energy of Ni in its bulk face‐centered cubic (FCC) structure, and E (O 2 ) monoclinic is the energy of O in its bulk monoclinic structure, then the formation energy (Δ𝐸 𝑓 ) is defined as 46,47 : Δ𝐸𝑓[]ENiO22Dgoodbreak−italicnENiFCCgoodbreak−italicnEO2monoclinic/ntotal The calculated value of Δ𝐸 𝑓 is found to be −4.40 eV and is much higher than other 2D oxides like PbO 2 (−0.641 eV), PdO 2 (−0.272 eV), PtO 2 (−0.405 eV), and SnO 2 (−1.01 eV) 26 indicating high chemical stability of the NiO 2 monolayer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The zT of 1.0 has only 10% Carnot efficiency, and increasing the value of zT to 4 can get a Carnot efficiency of about 30%, which is equivalent to home refrigeration. [8][9][10][11] However, it is still a huge challenge to increase the value of zT to 4. 12 The κ L is an important condition for judging whether a material has excellent TE properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%