2018
DOI: 10.29322/ijsrp.8.5.2018.p7751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Equation Modeling on Likert Scale Data With Transformation by Successive Interval Method and With No Transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was used to find the detrimental conceptual model. Before performing EFA, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's sphericity tests (BTS) were used to assess the data fit [116]. The KMO test was used to determine the proportion of variance shared by variables.…”
Section: Measurement Model Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was used to find the detrimental conceptual model. Before performing EFA, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's sphericity tests (BTS) were used to assess the data fit [116]. The KMO test was used to determine the proportion of variance shared by variables.…”
Section: Measurement Model Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BN can be applied to model systems or datasets with limited information or high uncertainty (Chen & Pollino, 2012;Uusitalo, 2007) and represent a promising tool to reveal complex associations among disparate data types, including questionnaires (Noyes, Cho, Ravel, Forney, & Abdo, 2018). They have been applied in several different fields of research, including water resources management (Bertone et al, 2016), education (Fernández, Morales, Rodríguez, & Salmerón, 2011;García, Amandi, Schiaffino, & Campo, 2007;Xenos, 2004), and climate change related beliefs (Cook & Lewandowsky, 2016), and they can deal with non-normal, non-linear data, outliers and small sample sizes, unlike a number of traditional statistical methods such as structural equation modelling (Mondiana, Pramoedyo, & Sumarminingsih, 2018).…”
Section: Bayesian Network Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to Mondiana et al (2018) KMO and the BTS determine the samples ability to run a factor analysis. In this sample the values of KMO and BTS both highly indicate this ability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sample the values of KMO and BTS both highly indicate this ability. According to Mondiana et al (2018) the sample is suitable when reaching a KMO over 0.60 and the BTS should be at α < 0.05. Here the KMO is at 0.80 and the BTS is 0.000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%