Structural heterogeneity in farm structures: a configurational approach

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a multidimensional framework for the identification, description and comparative analysis of alternative farm structures and their properties for economic development. Design/methodology/approach Integrating previous typologies and considering a large set of examples, the authors identify six attributes that are necessary to characterize and compare farm structures: size; strategy; organizational form; legal form; who the owners are; and degree of separation of ownership and control. They also discuss potential complementarities between those organizational attributes and specific features of the institutions of developing and emerging countries, such as contract enforcement and property rights protection regime, and developed capital markets and corporate law. Findings Conceptually and empirically, effective farm structures can deviate from the templates traditionally considered – “small family-owned farm” or “large factory-like corporate farm,” combining structural attributes in diverse ways. The dimensionalization of farm structures also helps in revealing complementary institutional traits at the regional or larger system level that may foster development processes. Research limitations/implications The paper is limited to theory building and case-based evidence. Nevertheless, it provides dimensions that can be measured on a larger scale and by quantitative studies. Originality/value This paper sheds light on organizational diversity in agriculture and on a wider set of feasible development paths.

Energizing the Next Generation and Strengthening the Agriculture Sector: Validating Key Indicators for Farm Exit in Sri Lanka

“…The findings are supported by previous studies [25,26,27,28]. The participants reported unsteady farming income and needed help managing living expenses.…”

“…Additionally, these cohorts learn new approaches quickly. Farmers may oppose technological advances, resulting in low harvest yields and stagnant productivity [25,26,27].…”

Broadening the scope of instrumental motivations for CSR disclosure: an illustration for agroholdings in transition economies

“…As this paper demonstrates, the institutional-legitimacy perspective of the firm is helpful for the theoretical incorporation of this development into the instrumental logic of corporate transparency. In particular, the perspective delivers arguments capable of explaining recent findings of blurred boundaries between mutually nonexclusive instrumental and moral motivations for socially responsible corporate action and communication (Gagalyuk, 2017;Grouiez, 2014;Miranda and Grandori, 2020;Visser et al, 2019). Furthermore, the paper empirically verifies the theoretical proposition that firms' moral considerations may take the form of instrumental motivations for deliberate socially responsible actions in weak institutional environments (Balmann et al, 2016).…”

“…Recent developments in Ukrainian agribusiness, with 21 (of approximately 100) very large agroholdings listed on international stock markets, appear particularly instructive. These large producers have gained systemic importance and generated significant policy-shaping power (Luyt et al, 2013;Mamonova, 2015;Miranda and Grandori, 2020). Studying the relationships between their corporate transparency policies, corporate growth indicators and concomitant changes in institutional structures promises insights into the development trajectories of corporate farming and its economic and social repercussions.…”

Circular agri-food systems: A governance perspective for the analysis of sustainable agri-food value chains

“…Topics of interest include the organization of cooperatives (e.g., Cook, 1995;Ménard, 2007), the role of contracts in the distribution of surplus in business relationships within agri-food systems (e.g., Grandori, 2015;di Marcantonio et al, 2020), innovation in linear agri-food systems (e.g., Karantininis et al, 2010;Materia et al, 2017), and the role of institutions and organizations in rural development (e.g., Cook and Chaddad, 2000;Swinnen and Maertens, 2007). The governance perspective has also helped identify new research puzzles such as the existence of concurrent sourcing strategies (Ménard, 2013), establishment of non-hierarchical firms in agri-food systems (Grandori, 2017), and organizational diversity within sets of similar transactions or arrangements (Miranda and Chaddad, 2014;Miranda and Grandori, 2019). For our purposes, however, it suffices to start with the basic characterization of a linear agri-food system, as summarized in Figure 2.…”