2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2021.111020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural, morphological, and luminescent properties of tetragonal-phase YPO4:Eu3+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,11,31 Notably, the band around 1000 cm −1 is split into two bands (one above and one below 1000 cm −1 ) in the case of the classic hydrothermal synthesis (B), while in the case of MW-synthesized samples (C, D), only a shouldered main band below 1000 cm −1 is seen. The split band has been reported for highly hydrated Eu:YPO 4 nanopowders, while the main band below 1000 cm −1 has been reported for the materials with a low hydration degree, 11 and it is claimed diagnostic for tetragonal phase in these types of materials. 17 Therefore, the shape of this band in our samples is the first suggestion that the degree of hydration is lower in MWsynthesized samples than in the classic hydrothermal method, with both samples in a tetragonal phase.…”
Section: Acs Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4,11,31 Notably, the band around 1000 cm −1 is split into two bands (one above and one below 1000 cm −1 ) in the case of the classic hydrothermal synthesis (B), while in the case of MW-synthesized samples (C, D), only a shouldered main band below 1000 cm −1 is seen. The split band has been reported for highly hydrated Eu:YPO 4 nanopowders, while the main band below 1000 cm −1 has been reported for the materials with a low hydration degree, 11 and it is claimed diagnostic for tetragonal phase in these types of materials. 17 Therefore, the shape of this band in our samples is the first suggestion that the degree of hydration is lower in MWsynthesized samples than in the classic hydrothermal method, with both samples in a tetragonal phase.…”
Section: Acs Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen from the full spectra shown in Figures 2a and S5, the main characteristic bands of the YPO 4 or Eu 3+ :YPO 4 compounds are visible in the MW-synthesized samples with no additional peaks. 4,11,31 The two sharp bands at around 530 and 640 cm −1 can be ascribed to the symmetric and antisymmetric bending of the O−P−O group respectively, while the band around 1000 cm −1 is ascribed to the P−O antisymmetric stretching. 4,11,31 Notably, the band around 1000 cm −1 is split into two bands (one above and one below 1000 cm −1 ) in the case of the classic hydrothermal synthesis (B), while in the case of MW-synthesized samples (C, D), only a shouldered main band below 1000 cm −1 is seen.…”
Section: Acs Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations