Structural networks and dyadic negotiations in tourism destination ecosystems

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate how and to what extent structural network properties affect dyadic negotiation behavior in tourism destination ecosystems. Specifically, this study addresses negotiation behavior in terms of problem-solving and contending, because these two key strategies reflect the integrative and distributive aspects of dyadic interactions. Design/methodology/approach This study relies on network data and dyadic survey data from nine mountain tourism destinations in Southeastern Norway. The structural network properties the authors research are triadic closure – the extent to which a dyad has common ties to other actors – and structural equivalence – the similarities in networking patterns that capture firms’ competition for similar resources. In addition, the authors also study a possible effect of relationship duration on negotiation behavior. Findings Triadic closure and relationship duration have positive effects on problem-solving, and structural equivalence tends to decrease problem-solving, although the effect is inconsistent; none of these three independent variables was found to affect contending negotiation behavior. Research limitations/implications This study shows that a dyad’s structural network embeddedness has implications for negotiation behavior. Further research is encouraged to develop this theoretical perspective. Originality/value This study is a pioneering investigation of how structural network properties affect dyadic negotiation behavior in ongoing coproducing relationships in real-world destination ecosystems.

Social network analysis in hospitality and tourism: Guest editorial

“…1. These are the numbers associated to the 13 papers: 1 – Wang et al (2023); 2 – Jokar et al (2022); 3 – Yang et al (2022); 4 – Ness et al (2022); 5 – Baggio et al (2022); 6 – Shrestha et al (2023); 7 – Ivars-Baidal et al (2023); 8 – McLeod et al (2022); 9- Blasi et al (2022); 10 – Vila-Lopez and Kuster-Boluda (2022); 11 – Breznik et al (2022); 12 – Wang et al (2022); 13 – Chen (2022). …”

“…Ness et al (2022) investigated how and to what extent structural network properties affect dyadic negotiation behavior in tourism destinations in Southeastern Norway. Dyad's structural network embeddedness has implications for negotiation behavior and that triadic closure and relationship duration have positive effects on problemsolving Baggio et al (2022).…”