2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45875-1_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and Constraints in Interactive Exploratory Algorithm Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have chosen to take the former approach, which helps to concentrate at issues pertinent to one abstraction level. We disagree with the criticism in (Faltin, 2001), which claims that structuring algorithms using this approach produces code that is longer and less efficient. The recent advances in compiler technology and the right mapping of the correctly designed pseudocode to a programming language make the code sufficiently efficient (see the illustrative example section).…”
Section: Requirementscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…We have chosen to take the former approach, which helps to concentrate at issues pertinent to one abstraction level. We disagree with the criticism in (Faltin, 2001), which claims that structuring algorithms using this approach produces code that is longer and less efficient. The recent advances in compiler technology and the right mapping of the correctly designed pseudocode to a programming language make the code sufficiently efficient (see the illustrative example section).…”
Section: Requirementscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…An intermediate technique is producing automatically program visualizations that let the user exert some control over the contents of the final animation, so that they can be tailored to a specific educational goal [42]. Alternatively, learners might be given a predefined visual representation, which they manipulate so as to simulate the algorithm [15,38].…”
Section: Constructingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responding results in significantly better learning outcomes than viewing [7,11,15,24 Presenting results in significantly better learning outcomes than constructing VI. Multiple Engagements:…”
Section: General Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interactive version of this visualization is available. * Table 1 presents the attributes that we extracted from each paper: (1) task; (2) need; (3) audience; (4) data source; (5) representation; (6) medium;…”
Section: Included and Excluded Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, visualization is not yet commonly used by developers. More than a decade ago, researchers wondered why is software visualization not widely used . They observed that one of the reasons is that efforts in software visualization are out of touch with the needs of developers .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%