2019
DOI: 10.3906/elk-1802-76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure tensor adaptive total variation for image restoration

Abstract: Image denoising and restoration is one of the basic requirements in many digital image processing systems. Variational regularization methods are widely used for removing noise without destroying edges that are important visual cues. This paper provides an adaptive version of the total variation regularization model that incorporates structure tensor eigenvalues for better edge preservation without creating blocky artifacts associated with gradient-based approaches. Experimental results on a variety of noisy i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We notice a lack of edge continuity, see for example in the images -Brain, Grape, and Lena top of the cap region, this is due to the fact that the augmented multiscale gradient maps can obtain lower values due to small scale oscillation compared to the uniform background pixels. A remedy to this can be to augment other differential operators such as the structure tensor [10], [14] or higher order derivatives. Table 2 shows the Entropy and Pratt's figure of merit (FoM) metric for the test images considered here.…”
Section: A Setup Parameters and Error Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We notice a lack of edge continuity, see for example in the images -Brain, Grape, and Lena top of the cap region, this is due to the fact that the augmented multiscale gradient maps can obtain lower values due to small scale oscillation compared to the uniform background pixels. A remedy to this can be to augment other differential operators such as the structure tensor [10], [14] or higher order derivatives. Table 2 shows the Entropy and Pratt's figure of merit (FoM) metric for the test images considered here.…”
Section: A Setup Parameters and Error Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (10), the weight update is performed by the average of the square of the loss function gradient and the mean square M s of the previous weight. Furthermore, (11) uses the mean square value of the previous weight, loss function gradient with learning rate η and numerical stabiliser ϵ.…”
Section: Optimisation Algorithm and Cost Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the recent spatial and transform domain methodologies are based on wavelet [8], total variation models [9, 10], robust block PCA [11], and fuzzy hysteresis smoothing [12]. Discrete wavelet transform (DWT) is a multi‐resolution analysis technique that uses a basis function and an appropriate thresholding operator on approximation and detail coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the inpainting result of the proposed method to other similar inpainting methods, it is necessary to assess image quality after inpainting based on the error metrics. The popular error metrics are PSNR and SSIM that were used in many works [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]: = 10 log 10 2,…”
Section: Image Quality Assessment Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%