Structured Public Involvement: Problems and Prospects for Improvement

Abstract

Public involvement in transportation planning and design has a problematic history. Professionals lack access to a coherent, organized method for communicating with the public, and some important principles of public involvement known to community design professionals are still being discovered by transportation professionals. A protocol, structured public involvement (SPI), is proposed. SPI was designed to ensure that public involvement is meaningful to the professional and the public. Principles of SPI are presented, and a series of steps useful for engaging the general public in a complex design or planning problem is given. SPI is intended to be transparent, accountable, democratic, and efficient. SPI places the use of technology within a public involvement framework built on community design experience. While technology can be useful, it must be placed in a social context. That is, various technologies are used because they can address such problems as lack of access to information, inconvenient and time-consuming meetings, confusing terms and graphics, and one-way communication. Highlights and examples are drawn from practical experience, where SPI protocols have been designed and used to solve problems of route planning, highway design, and transit-oriented development. While each problem set called for a different mix of technical tools, the protocol within which those tools were used was the same, with similar encouraging results. With SPI, public participation is less contentious and more informed, and the professional has information of high quality with which to begin the design process.

A Novel Framework for Sustainable Traffic Safety Programs Using the Public as Sensors of Hazardous Road Information

“…Unlike other countries, CP in Korean transportation projects was reviewed prior to the 1990s, but most studies have been limited to suggesting policies and their necessity [43][44][45][46]. Previous studies have indicated that some of the keys to the success of CP efforts are the serious and timely treatment and follow-up of citizen input, such as online comments, incoming calls, and emails [47,48]. Therefore, the traditional techniques of CP, such as personal interviews, public meetings or hearings, and telephone techniques, could rarely be successful.…”

Geodesign dynamics for sustainable urban watershed development

“…Studies over the years have suggested the need for tools that help planners and designers be more effective (Bishop 1998, Voss et al 2003. Several reviews exist that describe participatory geospatial information tools designed to combine analysis and deliberation (Balram and Dragacevic 2006, Brail 2008, Grossardt, Bailey and Brumm 2003, Jankowski and Nyerges 2001, Klosterman 1997, and Nyerges, Couclelis and McMaster 2011. Decision support software tends to be developed narrowly because of the complexity of space-time decision problems (Jankowski et al 2006).…”

Introduction to Electric Transmission Line Routing using a Decision-Landscape Based Methodology

“…The public can develop useful compromises. These principles form the basis for the KTC's Structured Public Involvement (SPI) protocols [14]. SPI protocols are designed to ensure that public input into the design and planning process happens before the process is begun: that is, planners and/or designers gain a clear and documented image of public preferences as part of their initial design process.…”