1988
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.37.4836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures at the electrodes of gas discharges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However no clear reference to the conductivity of the resistive electrode is made in Ref. 9. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However no clear reference to the conductivity of the resistive electrode is made in Ref. 9. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The considerable amount of papers on this topic illustrates the interest in the plasma community for selforganization, which typically occurs in the anode or cathode layer. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] According to Müller,9 patterns of spots occur if a bistable layer, characterized by an S-shaped voltage-current density characteristic, is in contact with a resistive medium. The resistive medium is necessary to stabilize a system of spots, i.e., to allow a potential difference at the electrode surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CGLE also serves as a generic equation describing systems near sub-critical bifurcations [2,3]. It relates to a wide range of dissipative phenomena in physics, such as binary fluid convection [4], electro-convection in nematic liquid crystals [5], patterns near electrodes in gas discharges [6] and oscillatory chemical reactions [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative differential conductivity of the glow discharge should then be the driving force of pattern formation. A number of authors [4,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] actually have aimed at deriving such models from gas discharge physics, but not in a systematic manner.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%