Strukturelle Religiosität auf dem Wege zur religiösen Indifferenz

Oevermann, Ulrich; Franzmann, Manuel

doi:10.1007/978-3-531-90213-5_3

Cited by 26 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Responding to the Challenge of Unbelief and Religious Indifference Today". 1 Together with Ulrich Oevermann, I applied a similar perspective at a conference in 2003 (Oevermann and Franzmann 2006). However, it has been discussed in particular in Britain.…”

Section: Shortcomings Of the New Wave Of Research On "Non Religion" Amentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many misconceptions become obvious, if we engage systematically in empirically reconstructing the structure, logic, and the particular characteristics of secularized belief and life-conduct at the individual level in their diverse variants. I have done this for many years based on interviews and biographical material (Franzmann 2005;Franzmann 2008;Franzmann 2012;Franzmann 2014;Franzmann 2015;Oevermann and Franzmann 2006). An extensive monograph including essential results of this research is underway (Franzmann 2016) and this article is also a product of that research.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

From “Atheism” to “Religious Indifference”: Suggestions for Future Research on Secularization

Franzmann¹

2016

Annual Review of the Sociology of Religion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Shortcomings Of the New Wave Of Research On "Non Religion" Amentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

From “Atheism” to “Religious Indifference”: Suggestions for Future Research on Secularization

Franzmann¹

2016

Annual Review of the Sociology of Religion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For example: Gartner, Pollack et al (2003); Franzmann, Gartner, et al (2006); Oevermann & Franzmann (2006); Murken (2008), Schmidt-Lux (2008); Bock, Feuchter, et al (2009); Wohlrab-Sahr, Karstein, et al (2009);Wohlrab-Sahr & Burchardt (2012); Kartstein (20x3); Antes & Fiihrding (2013).…”

Section: Introduction: the Diversity Of Nonreligionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Outline of a Relational Approach to ‘Nonreligion’

Quack

2014

Method Theory Study Religion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article proposes a programmatic approach to study nonreligion relationally. "Nonreligion" denotes phenomena that are generally not considered religious but whose significance is more or less dependent on religion (atheists are an obvious example). This approach draws on sociological field-theory to outline how different modes of nonreligiosity result from different configurations of the religious field they relate or are related to, influenced by the cultural and socio-political backgrounds of different societies. Furthermore, modes of nonreligion can be distinguished by differ ent ways of relating to religion. While this relationship is primarily "negative" in some cases, most examples display "positive" characteristics, such as the reference to secular morality through humanism and human rights or the stress of alternative worldviews based on science and naturalism. The article concludes that the diversity of nonreli gion ought to be studied in its own right and on the basis of empirical research that focuses on religious-nonreligious entanglements.

show abstract

Conceptualising Religious Indifferences in Relation to Religion and Nonreligion

Quack

Schuh

2017

Religious Indifference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Strukturelle Religiosität auf dem Wege zur religiösen Indifferenz

Cited by 26 publications

References 1 publication

From “Atheism” to “Religious Indifference”: Suggestions for Future Research on Secularization

From “Atheism” to “Religious Indifference”: Suggestions for Future Research on Secularization

Outline of a Relational Approach to ‘Nonreligion’

Conceptualising Religious Indifferences in Relation to Religion and Nonreligion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About