2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-018-3855-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Struvite Precipitation from Anaerobically Digested Dairy Manure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The table shows that the ACEC reactor was comparable to the other technologies in terms of nutrients removal. The recent study achieved 88.4% removal of phosphate, which was comparable to the reactor STR and Electrolyzer from previous studies (Aguado et al, 2019; Brown et al, 2018; Taddeo & Lepistö, 2015; Wang, Fu et al, 2019). In terms of nitrogen removal, the recent study achieved 56.0% which was higher than the STR reactor from the previous study (Xavier et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The table shows that the ACEC reactor was comparable to the other technologies in terms of nutrients removal. The recent study achieved 88.4% removal of phosphate, which was comparable to the reactor STR and Electrolyzer from previous studies (Aguado et al, 2019; Brown et al, 2018; Taddeo & Lepistö, 2015; Wang, Fu et al, 2019). In terms of nitrogen removal, the recent study achieved 56.0% which was higher than the STR reactor from the previous study (Xavier et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…1.0 8.3 ± 0.9 10.4 ± 0.6 46.2 ± 2.1 13.1 ± 0.9 362 2.0 14.7 ± 1.2 22.9 ± 0.9 57.1 ± 1.1 18.6 ± 0.9 498 3.0 9.9 ± 1.1 11.6 ± 0.5 35.2 ± 1.7 8.6 ± 0.7 257 4.0 8.8 ± 1.1 12.5 ± 0.9 34 ± 0.4 9.8 ± 0.8 288 5.0 5.8 ± 0.3 8.2 ± 0.9 28.8 ± 1.7 9.8 ± 0.7 256 removal of phosphate, which was comparable to the reactor STR and Electrolyzer from previous studies (Aguado et al, 2019;Brown et al, 2018;Taddeo & Lepistö, 2015;Wang, Fu et al, 2019). In terms of nitrogen removal, the recent study achieved 56.0% which was higher than the STR reactor from the previous study (Xavier et al, 2014).…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Ph On Nutrients Removal and Struvite Preci...supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The P recovery efficiencies were between 64% for P1 and 88% for P4 (Table 3). These results for P recovery are consistent with those reported by Brown et al [23], who obtained 80% total P recovery from anaerobically digested manure, using stirred reactors for struvite precipitation, also with MgCl 2 •6H 2 O and at pH 8.7, and using NaOH to control the pH. The results obtained are also in agreement with those reported by Taddeo et al [24], who obtained a P recovery efficiency of approximately 80% from co-digested and raw swine slurry, also using NaOH to obtain pH values of 10, but MgO as the Mg source.…”
Section: P Recoverysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Further, Weissengruber et al (2018) concluded that potentially toxic element and persistent organic pollutant accumulations would be low to negligible even after 200 yr of struvite application (at 11 kg P ha −1 yr −1 ). In addition to recovery from municipal wastewater, recovery and use (as a fertilizer) of struvite from human urine, livestock urine and manure, and food processing wastes have received considerable attention (Antonini et al, 2012; Achat et al, 2014; Uysal et al, 2014; Katanda et al, 2016; Brown et al, 2018; Katanda et al, 2019; Muhmood et al, 2019). Struvite P recovery potential from municipal and agricultural wastewater ranges from 10 to 99%, depending in part on the process used and the source and P concentration of the waste product (Jordaan et al, 2010; Egle et al, 2016; Peng et al, 2018; Muhmood et al, 2019).…”
Section: Recycling and Recovering Phosphorus From Waste Streams Back mentioning
confidence: 99%