2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student residential apartment performance evaluation using integrated AHP-FCE method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the various quality risk assessment indicators with obvious hierarchy during the construction of urban rail transit, in this study, the AHP method was used to determine the weight of each subgoal and subsystem and perform mathematical analysis based on expert semi-structured interviews to determine the weights of the indicators. FCE is a method based on fuzzy mathematics membership theory and can solve multivariable problems in complex decisionmaking processes [26,28]. However, when dealing with complex problems and multiple evaluation indicators, it is difficult for FCE to directly provide the weight of each evaluation, for which the AHP is effective [29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the various quality risk assessment indicators with obvious hierarchy during the construction of urban rail transit, in this study, the AHP method was used to determine the weight of each subgoal and subsystem and perform mathematical analysis based on expert semi-structured interviews to determine the weights of the indicators. FCE is a method based on fuzzy mathematics membership theory and can solve multivariable problems in complex decisionmaking processes [26,28]. However, when dealing with complex problems and multiple evaluation indicators, it is difficult for FCE to directly provide the weight of each evaluation, for which the AHP is effective [29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to consider the whole picture, comprehensively consider the object under study, and grasp the general nature of the matter to obtain accurate and reasonable evaluation results. According to the relevant literature [24][25][26][27], methods widely used for construction risk evaluation are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to AHP, the indicator weights obtained through entropy value calculation by EW are more objective. The combination of AHP and EW rationalizes the indicator weights, and this method is widely applied in various elds for comprehensive assessments, such as urban sustainability assessments 18 , government performance assessments for air pollution control 19 , environmental assessments for suppliers 20 , residentoriented apartment performance evaluations 21 , and urban ood risk assessments 22 , among other studies.…”
Section: Data Sources and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fuzzy relationship matrix is formed by the evaluator determining the degree of affiliation (i.e. likelihood) of each evaluation object in relation to each evaluation level based on the particular result of each index, which is the first step in the FCE method [ 36 ]. A weight vector is formed by combining the weights derived from the analytic hierarchy process method with user requirements, which serve as an evaluation item in the product design.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%