1959
DOI: 10.1080/00015125909433307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on Monozygous Cattle Twins. XVII. Once-a-day milking compared with twice-a-day milking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
37
1
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
13
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The changes in milk composition recorded in primiparous cows during period 1 agreed with those commonly observed with RMF (Claesson et al, 1959;Holmes et al, 1992;Carruthers et al, 1993). ).…”
Section: Performancesupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The changes in milk composition recorded in primiparous cows during period 1 agreed with those commonly observed with RMF (Claesson et al, 1959;Holmes et al, 1992;Carruthers et al, 1993). ).…”
Section: Performancesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In analytical studies of short duration where the effects of previous milking intervals and residual milk were eliminated, physiologists have shown that milk secretion rate decreases curvilinearly with the duration of the milking interval (Wheelock et at, 1966) or is virtually constant over the first 16 h h after milking (cf Elliott, 1959;Labussi6re and Richard, 1965), which would correspond to about 13 h under conventional milking conditions (Elliott et al, 1960). Loss in milk yield resulting from milking omissions depends on the characteristics of these omissions: frequency (from 35% and 50% for I omission/day (Claesson et al, 1959;Holmes et al, 1992) to only slightly for I omission/week (Labussière et Coindet, 1968;Radcliffe et al, 1973)), stage of lactation at which omissions are imposed (Eldridge and Clark, 1978), and duration of implementation (Claesson et al, 1959). Milk loss also depends on the cows' characteristics (rank of lactation (Woolford et al, 1985), ), breed (Carruthers et al, 1993), anatomy of the udder ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus this practice did not give rise to any specific health problems, in particular mastitis, as is always the case with herds in good health (Claesson et al, 1959;Holmes et al, 1992;. As is often found in trials of short duration (less than 10 weeks) conducted after the lactation peak, OAD was not long enough to increase the cows' weight and/or fatness (O'Brien et al, 2002;Ferris et al, 2003;Gué guen et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is conflicting literature on this aspect: an increase in somatic cell count [17,22,30,40], no effect [25,26,41], increase or not depending on whether the baseline cell count was high or low [21]. Trials overall nonetheless showed the absence of an impact on mastitis incidence [11,17,30]. However, the greater stretching of udders observed here under the effect of a larger quantity of milk built up after 24-hours of secretion could, in the long run, lead to a higher incidence of collapsed udders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%