1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16037.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the intracellular distributions of soluble epoxide hydrolase and of catalase by digitonin‐permeabilization of hepatocytes isolated from control and clofibrate‐treated mice

Abstract: Digitonin permeabilization of hepatocytes from control and clofibrate-treated (0.5% by mass, 10 days) male C57b1/6 mice was used to study the intracellular distributions of soluble ('cytosolic') epoxide hydrolase and of catalase. The following conclusions were drawn. (1) About 60% of the total soluble epoxide hydrolase activity in control mouse hepatocytes is situated in the cytosol. (2) The rest is not mitochondrial, but probably peroxisomal. (3) Of the total catalase activity in control mouse hepatocytes, 5 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the initial reports of sEH activity, sEH was detected in mitochondrial, microsomal and cytosolic fractions by activity or in the peroxisomes alone by immunohistochemistry (Waechter et al, 1983; Kaur and Gill, 1986; Hollinshead and Meijer, 1988). Eventually it was determined that the activity in the mitochondrial fractions was an artifact from peroxisomal contamination, and the same enzyme was responsible for the activity in the cytosol and peroxisomes (Chang and Gill, 1991; Eriksson et al, 1991). The small amount of sEH either trapped in the microsomes or tightly associated with them can be differentiated with selective substrates or inhibitors.…”
Section: Mammalian Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the initial reports of sEH activity, sEH was detected in mitochondrial, microsomal and cytosolic fractions by activity or in the peroxisomes alone by immunohistochemistry (Waechter et al, 1983; Kaur and Gill, 1986; Hollinshead and Meijer, 1988). Eventually it was determined that the activity in the mitochondrial fractions was an artifact from peroxisomal contamination, and the same enzyme was responsible for the activity in the cytosol and peroxisomes (Chang and Gill, 1991; Eriksson et al, 1991). The small amount of sEH either trapped in the microsomes or tightly associated with them can be differentiated with selective substrates or inhibitors.…”
Section: Mammalian Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cells were washed sequentially with warm Puck's saline followed by cytomix at 37°C, permeabilized using the optimized conditions noted, and chased in 5 ml of DMEM (without serum and additives) containing 10 mM ATP and 10 mM MgCl 2 at pH 7.0. Our methods were developed from published procedures (36). Permeabilized cells were maintained at 37°C in the incubator during the chase.…”
Section: Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low concentrations the detergent digitonin affects the permeability of the plasma membrane without having any detectable effects on the integrity of the peroxisomal membrane [37]. As a result, cytosolic proteins are released from cells during incubation with digitonin but there is no release of peroxisomal proteins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%