1982
DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs1951.32.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the Utility of Artificial Mutations in Plant Breeding : XIII. Mutagenicity of Several Alkylating Agents in Rice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alkylating agents are being used as plant chemical mutagens for many years as they are the most successful chemical mutagen for creating new plant mutants. Many alkylating agents can be used in induced mutagenesis; Ethylenimine (EI), Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), and Mustard gas are four such commonly used alkylating agents (Fujimoto and Yamagata, 1982). There are three functional types of alkylating agents: mono-, bi-or poly-functional types.…”
Section: Alkylating Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alkylating agents are being used as plant chemical mutagens for many years as they are the most successful chemical mutagen for creating new plant mutants. Many alkylating agents can be used in induced mutagenesis; Ethylenimine (EI), Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), and Mustard gas are four such commonly used alkylating agents (Fujimoto and Yamagata, 1982). There are three functional types of alkylating agents: mono-, bi-or poly-functional types.…”
Section: Alkylating Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Mahapatra ( 1983 ), sodium azide at low pH was more effective and effi cient than gamma rays, EMS, and NMU in inducing mutations. Among monofunctional mutagens, while methylating agents are more toxic and have to be used only at lower concentrations (Fujimoto and Yamagata 1982 ), ethylating agents, being less toxic, can be applied at relatively higher concentrations to yield more favorable mutations. Intervarietal differences with respect to effectiveness and effi ciency of the mutagens have been reported by Sharma ( 2001 ).…”
Section: Mutagenic Effectiveness and Effi Ciencymentioning
confidence: 99%