2002
DOI: 10.1006/jmsp.2001.8499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study and Characterization of Resonances in the Four-Wave Mixing Signal of a Two-Level System with Intramolecular Coupling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the squared polarization of the peak 2 is non-zero at f0.5, contrasting with the others peaks, which at this point have a null magnitude, and consequently will show null intensity. This fact can be explained because each peak is governed by particular terms of Polarization expression, which define its behavior [13]. Considering this aspect, it is posible to observe that the relative polarization expressions of the peaks 1, 2 and 4 are directly proportional with the squared of the longitudinal relaxation times, fact that is not true for the case of the peaks 3, 5 and 6, which are only proportional to the transversal relaxations times, and consequently do not change their values of Polarization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, the squared polarization of the peak 2 is non-zero at f0.5, contrasting with the others peaks, which at this point have a null magnitude, and consequently will show null intensity. This fact can be explained because each peak is governed by particular terms of Polarization expression, which define its behavior [13]. Considering this aspect, it is posible to observe that the relative polarization expressions of the peaks 1, 2 and 4 are directly proportional with the squared of the longitudinal relaxation times, fact that is not true for the case of the peaks 3, 5 and 6, which are only proportional to the transversal relaxations times, and consequently do not change their values of Polarization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This fact is explained using the functional relation of the peaks to the polarization expression, which in turn defines their behavior [52]. From this relation, it is possible to show that the relative polarization expressions of peaks 1, 2, and 4 have an direct dependence with the longitudinal relaxation times, fact that is not true for the case of peaks 3, 5, and 6, which are only proportional to the transversal relaxations times.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fourier component to second-order in the pump beam and to first-order in the probe beam of the polarization is given by [52,53] …”
Section: The Fwm Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to mention that the response ofthe peaks 2 and 6 is governed for the transition dipole moments, but the other peaks arise when the permanent dipole moments are included. Peak 2 is related with the coherence density matrix term, and peak 6 is related with the population density matrix elements [9].…”
Section: Macroscopic Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the symmetry presented by the first six peaks respect to the other ones, only the first ones are considered in the present research work. Moreover, each peak is characterized by reduced polarization expressions that permit us to analyze its behavior with the changes in the coupling parameters [9].…”
Section: Macroscopic Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%