Study and Design of SDN Intelligent Campus Architecture based on IPv6

Chen, Yange; Xiao-pin, Yang; Zhang, Zhi-Li; Zhao, Liang

doi:10.14257/ijfgcn.2016.9.12.33

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Technology is the driver of smart campuses, mainly through the Internet of Things (IoT) and ICT to enhance the informatization level in colleges and universities [31][32][33][34][35][36]. The wide range of technologies supports and digitalizes processes, teaching, research, and services rapidly and harmoniously [35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”

Section: Smart Campusmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Those higher results in technology-related attributes indicate that UFCG follows the smart campus technology-driven approach. In this view, a university enhances its informatization level through an interconnection of physical and virtual systems, characterized as an advanced digital campus [38,42,50,70]. However, recent smart campus perspectives promote new educational paradigms and improvements in different dimensions to better meet the stakeholders' needs [11,12,71].…”

Section: Ipa Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The first quadrant gathered 28.9% of the attributes (11), indicating that they are important to respondents but should receive more attention from decision makers to improve their low performance. The most relevant attribute is internet technologies (TE-01), which is also fourth in the general ranking, but its performance is ranked at 25 ized as an advanced digital campus [38,42,50,70]. However, recent smart campus perspectives promote new educational paradigms and improvements in different dimensions to better meet the stakeholders' needs [11,12,71].…”

Section: Ipa Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Smart Campus Framework: Challenges and Opportunities for Education Based on the Sustainable Development Goals

Nóbrega

Chim-Miki²,

Castillo-Palacio³

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although technology improvements boosted the digital transition of universities, which built a path for smart campuses, the smartization process is more than simply promoting digitalization. This research aims to identify the essential elements and the most significant deficiencies in the smart campus dimensions and its variables from the user’s viewpoint to offer a list of priorities for decision-makers. Through an importance-performance analysis (IPA) performed using IBP SPSS 26, we tested an integrative smart campus framework in a Brazilian university, previously validated with Latin American experts. This research confirmed that eight dimensions are important for a smart campus evaluation and provided a list of priorities for academic managers. The results indicated the main gaps among importance and performance. This research concluded that the smartization process could not rely on technology attributes only. Universities should meet the modern society’s present and emerging needs and the labor market in a sustainable, social, and technological manner. Smart campuses in developing countries may prioritize different components than developed countries, such as infrastructure. We propose that more studies should apply the framework in more universities.

show abstract