2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-9883(02)00025-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of efficiency and productivity growth in opencast and underground coal mining in India: a DEA analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…θ is a value between zero and one. It determines how much the input x io should be reduced to θxo radially to get DMU o to the efficient frontier (Kulshreshtha and Parikh, 2002;Cooper et al, 2006). The purpose of Stage II is to find a solution which makes the sum of the input excesses and output shortfalls maximum maintaining θ = θ*.…”
Section: The Ccr Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…θ is a value between zero and one. It determines how much the input x io should be reduced to θxo radially to get DMU o to the efficient frontier (Kulshreshtha and Parikh, 2002;Cooper et al, 2006). The purpose of Stage II is to find a solution which makes the sum of the input excesses and output shortfalls maximum maintaining θ = θ*.…”
Section: The Ccr Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kulshreshtha and Parikh [10] and Deshpande and Weisskopf [11] used DEA and Kathuria et al [1] used SFA. Using firm level data, LP [4] was used widely by Mitra et al [12], Sharma and Mishra [13], Singh [2].…”
Section: Productivity: Research In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that DEA applications in this area include Budeba et al (2015), Byrnes et al (1988), Fang et al (2009) and Kulshreshtha and Parikh (2002).…”
Section: Coalmentioning
confidence: 99%