2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-012-0769-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of hydrodynamic characteristics in tubular photobioreactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It will be conducted in the future. In particle trajectory simulation, cells in this work were taken as inert particles as in most researches (Huang et al 2014;Gao et al 2017;Pruvost et al 2008;Zhang et al 2013Zhang et al , 2015, while in real world particles are not (Suali and Sarbatly 2012;Razzak et al 2013;Kreis et al 2018). A more accurate particle tracking model including the shape and biological properties may present more detailed and accurate particle trajectories.…”
Section: Efficiency Of L/d Cycle Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It will be conducted in the future. In particle trajectory simulation, cells in this work were taken as inert particles as in most researches (Huang et al 2014;Gao et al 2017;Pruvost et al 2008;Zhang et al 2013Zhang et al , 2015, while in real world particles are not (Suali and Sarbatly 2012;Razzak et al 2013;Kreis et al 2018). A more accurate particle tracking model including the shape and biological properties may present more detailed and accurate particle trajectories.…”
Section: Efficiency Of L/d Cycle Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the adding of mixers also increases energy consumption (mainly pumping costs). For instance, according to Zhang et al (2013), the simulated energy consumption (calculated by pressure drop) of the PBR with helical mixer was 0.3 J kg −1 m −1 , which was much higher than that of the smooth PBR (0.0136 J kg −1 m −1 ). It means that the energy consumption has increased almost by 2106% on inserting of the helical mixer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing the recirculation flow velocity in tubular PBRs will result in important energy and cost savings. The analysis was based on an average flow velocity of 0.5 m/s, which is a common value used for commercial tubular PBRs [10][11][12][13][14]. Acién Fernández et al [14] and Molina et al [11] motivate the choice of the flow velocity by: 1) sufficient turbulence is required for mixing and to prevent biofilm formation, and 2) high flow velocities should be avoided to prevent cell stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L-shapes in tubular PBRs results in death zones and energy loss and therefore they redesigned the bend shapes with CFD. Other authors used CFD to optimize the mixing behaviour with good results [12,13,[19][20][21]. Perner-Nochta and Posten [12] simulated the fluid dynamics of tubular PBRs with static mixers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation