2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5054990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of M-band X-ray preheating effect on shock propagation via streaked optical pyrometer system at SG-III prototype lasers

Abstract: The M-band X-ray (1.6–4.4 keV) preheating and shock temperature of aluminum (Al) foil coated on a thick polystyrene (CH) layer is experimentally measured using a streaked optical pyrometer system (SOP) in the SG-III prototype laser facility for the first time. Multi-group hydrodynamic simulation captures the main characteristics of rear surface emission. Compared with the unpreheated target with bromine (Br) doped, M-band X-rays have a large impact on shock propagation inside the undoped target. Preheating cha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hard x-ray (such as Au M-band x-ray [3]: 2-5 keV) can preheat material ahead of the shock wave [4]. It may significantly influence the shock propagation and reduce the achievable compression [5,6]. Therefore, worldwide studies and experiments related to M-band x-ray have * Authors to whom any correspondence should be addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hard x-ray (such as Au M-band x-ray [3]: 2-5 keV) can preheat material ahead of the shock wave [4]. It may significantly influence the shock propagation and reduce the achievable compression [5,6]. Therefore, worldwide studies and experiments related to M-band x-ray have * Authors to whom any correspondence should be addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would decrease the capsule compressibility and result in lower areal density. Preheating ahead of the shock front also causes significant shock propagation variation in the capsule thereby reducing the final yield [14]. As the rear surface of the foil expands due to preheating, large uncertainties in EOS diagnostics creep in [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%