2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13538-014-0274-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Reaction Cross Section of Light Mass Nuclei Using Glauber Formalisms

Abstract: How to citeComplete issue More information about this article Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Scientific Information System Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The neutron skin thickness (difference between the neutron and proton rms radii) of the 208 Pb nucleus is predicted to be of 0.21 fm, which is in good accord with recent determinations of this observable [63][64][65][66]. Properties of light nuclei [67] and of reaction cross sections for a series of halo nuclei in the light mass region [68,69] have been studied using SEI and good agreement with the RMF NL3 predictions and experiment has been found.…”
Section: Finite Range Simple Effective Interaction and Neutron Star Eossupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The neutron skin thickness (difference between the neutron and proton rms radii) of the 208 Pb nucleus is predicted to be of 0.21 fm, which is in good accord with recent determinations of this observable [63][64][65][66]. Properties of light nuclei [67] and of reaction cross sections for a series of halo nuclei in the light mass region [68,69] have been studied using SEI and good agreement with the RMF NL3 predictions and experiment has been found.…”
Section: Finite Range Simple Effective Interaction and Neutron Star Eossupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Fig. 1 shows that the present calculations which consider the combined effects of Pauli blocking, finite range, higher momentum transfer components, and phase variation (solid line) give better agreement with recent data [35] than the previous calculations of [20,21,22], which neglected combined effects.…”
Section: Mevmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The calculated 12 C+ 12 C total reaction cross section at 30-1000 MeV/n using the modified Coulomb Glauber model is shown in Fig. 1 with a comparison between experimental data [35,36] and previous calculations [20,21,22]. Fig.…”
Section: Mevmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation