1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.57.1789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Solids by Use of Nonthermalized Positrons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of n depends on the energy and varies from 1.16 at 3 MeV to 1.68 at 10 keV. 25,26 From Monte Carlo simulations 21 and from studies of multilayer structures, 26,27 it was found that nϷ1.6 for positrons, but there are indications that this value depends on the material. 28 The shaping parameter m is close to 2 as shown from fits to Monte Carlo simulations 21 and from studies of multilayer structures.…”
Section: A Diffusion Of Thermal Positronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The value of n depends on the energy and varies from 1.16 at 3 MeV to 1.68 at 10 keV. 25,26 From Monte Carlo simulations 21 and from studies of multilayer structures, 26,27 it was found that nϷ1.6 for positrons, but there are indications that this value depends on the material. 28 The shaping parameter m is close to 2 as shown from fits to Monte Carlo simulations 21 and from studies of multilayer structures.…”
Section: A Diffusion Of Thermal Positronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In lifetime measurements, 29,30 nonthermal trapping of positrons was proposed to explain a drop with temperature in f , the annihilation rate of untrapped positrons. Nonthermal positron trapping in vacancies was observed only recently 25,31 and was shown to affect the analysis of the diffusion length of positrons. These experiments also showed that trapping is very efficient and can occur faster than 10 Ϫ15 s. A recent theoretical model 32 showed resonances in the trapping rate at energies of about 1-2 eV that can only enhance nonthermal trapping.…”
Section: B Nonthermal Positronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This peak is due to the resonant p-wave scattering, which causes a considerable enhancement of the delocalized wave function a t the defect and thereby the increase of the energy lev) - vacancies are shown matrix element (19). McMullen and Stott [19] realized that the appearance of the resonance explains in a natural way the depletion of the flux of positrons reemitted from A1 samples in the slow positron beam experiments [30]. This kind of phenomena is not possible in the old model calculations [17,18, 291 based on approximative positron wave functions.…”
Section: Defects In Setrricoiiductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%