1995
DOI: 10.1016/0168-583x(95)00443-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of some analytical-methodological aspects in nuclear microprobe analysis of soft biological tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This encouraging result is even more significant because gelatin standards, commonly used for testing and quantitative analysis of biological materials (Marshall, 1982), are much more sensitive to beam interactions than animal or plant tissues (Marshall, 1980). Mass losses during electron and proton bombardment at room temperature are evident and well documented, especially when high currents are applied (Cholewa et al, 1991;Llabador et al, 1990;Themner, 1991;Themner et al, 1990;Van Lierde, 1995;Zierold, 1988). It is therefore beneficial to perform analyses of fragile materials at low temperature.…”
Section: Limits Of Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This encouraging result is even more significant because gelatin standards, commonly used for testing and quantitative analysis of biological materials (Marshall, 1982), are much more sensitive to beam interactions than animal or plant tissues (Marshall, 1980). Mass losses during electron and proton bombardment at room temperature are evident and well documented, especially when high currents are applied (Cholewa et al, 1991;Llabador et al, 1990;Themner, 1991;Themner et al, 1990;Van Lierde, 1995;Zierold, 1988). It is therefore beneficial to perform analyses of fragile materials at low temperature.…”
Section: Limits Of Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 74%