2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the Progressive Changes in Canal Shape After Using Different Instruments by Hand in Simulated S-Shaped Canals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The S-shape canal used, possibly as a result of the increased difficulty of instrumentation, has been reported to be of use in pointing up differences in performance of instruments (18,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The S-shape canal used, possibly as a result of the increased difficulty of instrumentation, has been reported to be of use in pointing up differences in performance of instruments (18,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difficulty has been correlated with the observation of performance differences between different instrument systems (22)(23)(24). Furthermore, the evaluation of the changes in canal curvatures after instrumentation has been widely used to assess the tendency of a given technique or of the mechanical properties of a certain instrument to maintain the original anatomy of the canal or rectify its curvatures (22,25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 The ProTaper Universal finishing files have a greater taper at the apical part of the instrument (F1, .07 and F2, .08), leading to increased stiffness or rigidity. 29 The Mtwo group created centered preparation 1 to 4 mm from the apex in both canal types. The reason for the centered preparation seems to be the gradually smaller amount of material removed from the canal walls.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%