1985
DOI: 10.1016/0040-6031(85)85023-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of thermal decomposition of FeC204·2H20

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
22
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2b). Generally, any of XRD patterns or Mössbauer spectra did not show the formation of ferric oxalate or magnetite as possible primary oxidation products, in contrary to some literature data [4,5,6,9]. The simultaneous presence of two Fe 2 O 3 polymorphs in the initial conversion stage can be explained by the non-equivalent diffusion conditions on the surface and in the bulk of oxalate particles, although the possible formation of hematite by the isochemical structural transformation of maghemite cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2b). Generally, any of XRD patterns or Mössbauer spectra did not show the formation of ferric oxalate or magnetite as possible primary oxidation products, in contrary to some literature data [4,5,6,9]. The simultaneous presence of two Fe 2 O 3 polymorphs in the initial conversion stage can be explained by the non-equivalent diffusion conditions on the surface and in the bulk of oxalate particles, although the possible formation of hematite by the isochemical structural transformation of maghemite cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Using XRD, many authors have identified maghemite and hematite in the mixture of reaction products after isothermal heating at different temperatures (200-350 °C) with a general agreement that α-Fe 2 O 3 is formed by thermally induced structural transformation of γ-Fe 2 O 3 [5][6][7]11]. Despite the results of dynamic TG analyses (no weight increase), powdered character of samples and static air atmosphere representing good oxidation conditions, two-step formation of maghemite is expected via Fe 3 O 4 , which is considered as the primary oxidation product [5,6,9]. Unfortunately, such surprising conclusion is not supported by experimental data at all [6] or results from XRD analyses [5,9], where distinguishing between Fe 3 O 4 and γ-Fe 2 O 3 spinel structures is problematic, especially in the nanocrystalline state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] In recent years many studies have been published on the thermal behaviour of ferrous oxalate dihydrate (FeC 2 O 4 ?2H 2 O) in various reaction atmospheres. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Depending on the experimental conditions, a diversified scale of reactions resulting in solid products varying in composition and valence state of iron has been reported. From the point of view of the basic research, the mechanism of these solid-state reactions is the key experimental issue as the published data are very controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally agreed that the transformation process occurs in two steps including dehydration followed immediately by oxidative decomposition resulting in a-Fe 2 O 3 (hematite) as the final decomposition product. [16][17][18][19][20][21] There are however some uncertainties concerning possible intermediates. Thus, FeO [16][17][18] and Fe 3 O 4 19 were suggested to be the primary decomposition products in oxygen or dry air, while c-Fe 2 O 3 (maghemite) was stabilized when a significant amount of water vapour was present in the reaction atmosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%