Study on Human Cranial Index with its Sex Difference from Central Kerala

Abstract

Background: Cranial index, primarily used as an indicator of race had been studied by various workers in view of its morphometric difference in sex prediliction. Hence it would be useful to identify sex of an individual from skeletal remains. Similar studies from our geographic region, if at all present might be very few.
 Aims and Objective: Based on maximum breadth and length of skull the study aimed at whether there was any statistically significant difference in the cranial index of male and female.
 Materials and Methods: We used 96 dry,intact skulls preserved in the departments of Forensic Medicine and Anatomy of various Medical Colleges in Kottayam, Ernakulam, Alappuzha and Pathanamthitta districts of Kerala state, India. Skull typed as male or female by observation method was measured for its maximum breadth andlength, cranial index derived and the data was entered against corresponding serial number. The data analysis was conducted using SPSS software.
 Results: The mean percentage values of cranial index for female and male were respectively 77.68±4.53 and 73.71±4.05 with the p-value noted as 0.0001from their ranks determined by Mann- Whitney U test whichshowed statistically significant difference in cranial index of the two sexes. Literature could reveal similar results in studies conducted by other authors.
 Conclusion: Hence this morphometric study proved that it is valuable to include the application of cranial index in the identification procedure of skeletal remains. Further metric studies in this field are needed with a wider usage of other indices.

Analysis of craniofacial indices of dry crania in Southeast and Southsouth Nigeria

“…With the exception of maximum cranial breadth, the values of the other linear variables (MCL, BZB, MFB and UFH) in our study was higher that the values reported by Senol et al [1] The value of the cranial index (CI) in our study was comparable (or higher) than reports from several works in India [8,13,17] (Table 5). However, it was lower than the values reported from works done in Turkey [1] and Thailand [10].…”